Misplaced Pages

User talk:JerryDavid89: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:30, 29 July 2011 editJerryDavid89 (talk | contribs)115 edits Stop whining about how you haven't received any explanation, when in fact you've received multiple explanations at significant length← Previous edit Revision as of 04:43, 29 July 2011 edit undoMalik Shabazz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers106,163 edits Your editing: new sectionNext edit →
Line 31: Line 31:


: Wow! Big font and all! ] (]) 02:30, 29 July 2011 (UTC) : Wow! Big font and all! ] (]) 02:30, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

== Your editing ==

Please don't make personal attacks, such as the one you made at ]. Continuing to do so may result in your being ''']ed'''. —&nbsp;]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 04:43, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

{| class="messagebox" style="width: 100%; background: ivory;"
| ]
|
| The ] has permitted ] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at ]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the ]. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the ], any expected ], or any ]. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read in the ] section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at ], with the appropriate sections of ], and with the case decision page.<!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic|{{{t}}}}}} -->
|} —&nbsp;]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 04:43, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:43, 29 July 2011

Welcome

Hello, JerryDavid89, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine have not conformed to Misplaced Pages's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Misplaced Pages articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Misplaced Pages also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  MarB4 •ɯɒɹ• 03:30, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Sentence at the end of first paragraph of United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine

Unfortunately, it interrupted the description of the resolution itself, it was unsourced and redundant to sourced material further down in the lead section, and it was becoming something of a controversy magnet... AnonMoos (talk) 05:27, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Marty Peretz

Hello. Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Take a look at Misplaced Pages:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. As you can see, it wasn't the time to revert my edit. Please revert yourself and discuss things. Thanks. Shootbamboo (talk) 02:29, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

"While this essay is not a policy or guideline itself"... I stopped reading there. :-) JerryDavid89 (talk) 03:25, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Minor edits

Hi, please could you read WP:MINOR. You've marked some of your edits as minor edits when they shouldn't have been marked that way. Many editors won't see minor edits appear in their watchlist, they prefer to hide them, so they will miss your changes. It's especially important to not get this wrong in topics covered by discretionary sanctions such as the Israel-Palestine conflict area. An editor was recently topic banned for 3 months largely for marking non-minor/controversial edits as minor for example. Thanks. Sean.hoyland - talk 11:18, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Which edit/s are you talking about? JerryDavid89 (talk) 11:23, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Stop whining about how you haven't received any explanation, when in fact you've received multiple explanations at significant length

This habit of yours is unfortunately quite annoying (not to mention rude). Furthermore, as User:Zero0000 pointed out on the article talk page, it was solely dependent on others' charitableness that you haven't already been reported for violating the middle-east related article edit-warring ban. If you continue to make a point of refusing to listen to anybody, then you may find the kindness of strangers running dry... AnonMoos (talk) 20:05, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Wow! Big font and all! JerryDavid89 (talk) 02:30, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Your editing

Please don't make personal attacks, such as the one you made at Talk:Gilad Atzmon. Continuing to do so may result in your being blocked. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 04:43, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read in the Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles#Final decision section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page.

— Malik Shabazz /Stalk 04:43, 29 July 2011 (UTC)