Misplaced Pages

User talk:TheTakeover: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:59, 21 July 2011 editCycloneGU (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers7,553 edits AN/I: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 12:54, 2 August 2011 edit undoDegenFarang (talk | contribs)2,116 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:

== Welcome == == Welcome ==
'''Welcome!''' '''Welcome!'''
Line 20: Line 19:


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 13:59, 21 July 2011 (UTC) Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 13:59, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

== External Link Spam ==
Look at the articles for very famous poker players. There is a reason you don't see 95 external links to every site that has ever done an interview or a profile on that player - because to allow that would invite massive amounts of spam. This standard must be applied to all of the articles. If these interviews or references provide useful information unavailable elsewhere it can be used as a reference and included in the article. External links are for official sites or completely objective data such as tournament or cash game results.

If you do not agree or you are unwilling to discuss this prior to reverting my edits, take this matter to dispute resolution or a noticeboard. Reverting my edits by flatly declaring I am wrong is not acceptable. You will be blocked if you continue this behavior. You have been warned. ] (]) 12:54, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:54, 2 August 2011

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, TheTakeover, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! — ξ 23:59, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Poker Babes

I don't think edit warring is the proper way to solve this. Poker-Babes is a self published source and is used in a massive number of articles as a reference and as an external link. This is clearly not warranted as this is not a PokerNews type authoritative poker website, it is the opinions of one person. Were it used sparingly I would not have a problem with it but it is clear somebody has been very aggressive about inserting this site into as many Misplaced Pages articles as possible and I don't think that is appropriate and it clearly meets my definition of 'spam' DegenFarang (talk) 02:29, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

You seem to have a long standing personal gripe. Obviously the site is not spam. It is owned by PokerStars now, which means it isn't self-published. TheTakeover (talk) 04:08, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Edit_Warring

AN/I

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. CycloneGU (talk) 13:59, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

External Link Spam

Look at the articles for very famous poker players. There is a reason you don't see 95 external links to every site that has ever done an interview or a profile on that player - because to allow that would invite massive amounts of spam. This standard must be applied to all of the articles. If these interviews or references provide useful information unavailable elsewhere it can be used as a reference and included in the article. External links are for official sites or completely objective data such as tournament or cash game results.

If you do not agree or you are unwilling to discuss this prior to reverting my edits, take this matter to dispute resolution or a noticeboard. Reverting my edits by flatly declaring I am wrong is not acceptable. You will be blocked if you continue this behavior. You have been warned. DegenFarang (talk) 12:54, 2 August 2011 (UTC)