| Revision as of 15:50, 18 March 2006 editMisza13 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,559 editsm Reverted edits by 82.15.17.152 to last version by Misza13 using godmode-light.js.← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:51, 18 March 2006 edit undo82.15.17.152 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| # Please stop removing content from Misplaced Pages; it is considered ]. If you want to experiment, please use the ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Test2a (Second level warning) --> ] 00:06, 5 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| # Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to ], you will be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:Test3-n (Third level warning) --> ~ ] 13:12, 5 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| #] This is your '''last warning'''. The next time you ] a page, you ''will'' be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:Test4 (Fourth level warning) --> ] 01:38, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Blocked.== | |||
| You have been blocked. Please stop vandalizing.--] 02:55, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="messagebox cleanup">This ] user has requested to be unblocked. '''Administrators:''' If there is a legitimate reason to remove the block, please ]; otherwise, please leave a note to that effect on the user's talk page. <br />In either case, please remove this template once you're done.</div> | |||
| Why would anyone with his right mind let this cultist, who calls himself Hamsacharya Dan and claims to be a Neuroscientist, muddle Misplaced Pages's credibility by inserting the following words in an article supposedly based on facts? | |||
| ], a Living Himalayan ] Master in the modern age, travels the world at the behest of ]. | |||
| So, does everyone here agree that the person who calls himself Gurunath is a Himalayan ] Master and that he travels the world at the behest of ]? Do those claims constitute fact? Why not reword them in a more realistic and socially acceptable way like: Another ] teacher who calls himself ] claims to be a living Himalayan Siddha Master in the modern age and travels the world to teach his own version of ]? | |||
| Why did I say that it should it be rendered like that? | |||
| # No person of authority within the tradition in which this person who calls himself Gurunath claims to be a part and representative of has declared him as a Living Himalayan ] Master in the modern age. | |||
| # ] is just a fancy name he fabricated for himself, unless of course he or any of his cronies can prove that it is his proper and legal name registered in the Government of India and the one being used in his passport and other legal documents like land titles, etc. Aliases are alright but legal names should also be included; if the ]'s legal name is mentioned why not this person's? Hiding behind a fake name, which wasn'y even given to him according to tradition, prevents people from investigating about his background and probing the authenticity of his most pompous claims. It is tantamount to strenthening his cult and assisting him in his con work. | |||
| # Who among us have hold any proof that he is travelling the world at ]'s behest and not of his own behest to make money and con people? | |||
| Allowing the person who calls himself Hamsacharya Dan to promote his cult and god here in this way makes a tabloid out of Misplaced Pages, it further weakens its credibility. | |||
| <hr /> | |||
| Hi! Whoever you are, if you want to gain credibility, be more accountable like registering and not inserting statements like --] 04:18, 8 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Yet another Babaji or too many Babajis! == | |||
| Gotcha. I'll add another line to ] and remove the confusion from the ] page and blank the redirects if you will follow up by (re) creating the ] page. Unfortunately, there appear to be quite a few webpages out there also confused on the issue, and I must have stumbled upon them... -] 00:40, 9 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I've hopefully cleaned up the mess and fixed up all the articles. The ] article can be filled out with more information from Mahendra Baba and Baba Hari Dasa that shouldn't clutter up the ] article. All three articles do or should mention the confusingly similarly named ] so no one tries to merge the articles. —] 01:42, 9 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Removing comments== | |||
| Do not remove comments from other peoples talk pages as it's vandalism. ] ] 06:24, 12 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Also read ]. Thanks. ] ] 15:55, 12 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Removing warnings== | |||
| I see you have blanked recent warnings on this page. This is in direct violation of official Misplaced Pages policy; see ''Removing warnings'' under ]. '''Do not blank this page''' or you ''will'' be blocked again. If you have any reason to dispute this restoration, please leave a note at ]. Thanks, ~ ] 08:45, 16 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Regarding your blanking with edit summary "''This is my own Talk Page, I can do whatever I want with it,''" this is unfortunately not the case. I'd suggest you read the section entitled ''Can I do whatever I want to my own user talk page?'' under ] to address this misconception of yours. '''This your last warning'''. Blank once more and you'll be blocked from editing; decision is up to you. ~ ] 11:22, 16 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Of course ''it is'' the case. I can do whatever I want with it. The article did not say that I can't. Even if you block me after I delete everything then still I was able to do what I want with it. Haven't you studied Logic? And why the hell can't I erase these warnings when they have already expired? I was already blocked, and so your "this is already your second warning" with the stop sign on the topmost of this page has already expired. The verdict was already served, and another sysop deemed it fit to immediately unblock me. | |||
| ::Now, what is your problem? Where does it state in any WP policy that I can be blocked because I deleted your comments in my own Talk Page? Your recent warnings are illegitimate. There is no ongoing issue that necessitates me to retain your bullshit and cocky comments. You are bullying me. {{unsigned|82.15.17.152|11:47, 16 March 2006 (UTC)}} | |||
| :::...*sigh*. Read! | |||
| :::''Where does it state in any WP policy that I can be blocked because I deleted your comments in my own Talk Page?'' | |||
| :::* ]: '''Removing warnings''': Removing warnings, whether for vandalism or other forms of prohibited/discouraged behavior, from one's talk page is also considered vandalism. | |||
| :::* ]: '''Can I do whatever I want to my own user talk page?''': Furthermore ] states: Removing ], whether for vandalism or other forms of prohibited/discouraged behavior, from one's talk page is also considered vandalism. | |||
| :::Curl up with a copy of ] one day. ~ ] 13:07, 16 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Blocked == | |||
| For ignoring the instructions above, you have been blocked for 24 hours. Additionally, I am going to semi-protect this page to stop further blanking. ] 13:26, 16 March 2006 (UTC) | |||