Misplaced Pages

:Requests for investigation: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:28, 19 March 2006 editComputerjoe (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers13,763 edits Hamsacharya dan← Previous edit Revision as of 12:39, 19 March 2006 edit undo82.15.17.152 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 61: Line 61:


* {{vandal|Hamsacharya dan}} -- an ordained teacher of the Hamsa Yoga Sangh cult has been creating havoc for the past weeks by relentlessly inserting the name of his guru, his guru's book, quotes from his guru's book, and external link to their website on the following articles ], ], ], and ] when the majority of the editors (actually all of them) who are experts on the subject agree that his guru is illegitimate, his inserts do not enrich (add anything substantial) to the already existing articles, and only aim to promote the personal interest of their organization. This ] wants to turn WP into a propaganda material for a highly questionable (possibly harmful) pseudo-Hindu cult while pretending to be an impartial concerned Wikipedian who only wants to enrich it. The situation is really bad. He has just been banned but as soon as he gets unbanned he begins to relentlessly vandalize the pages with irrelevant and immaterial cult propaganda once again. It is futile to try and protect the integrity of an article when someone like this person ], like the Energizer Bunny, keeps on reverting them and gets away with it without being taught a lesson. To see for yourself that ] is really an ordained teacher of the cult he keeps on inserting to the articles and not just a concerned Wikipedian with no alterior motive, please see the following website and scroll down a bit for Hamsacharya Dan Kogan. Please help. --] 12:21, 19 March 2006 (UTC) * {{vandal|Hamsacharya dan}} -- an ordained teacher of the Hamsa Yoga Sangh cult has been creating havoc for the past weeks by relentlessly inserting the name of his guru, his guru's book, quotes from his guru's book, and external link to their website on the following articles ], ], ], and ] when the majority of the editors (actually all of them) who are experts on the subject agree that his guru is illegitimate, his inserts do not enrich (add anything substantial) to the already existing articles, and only aim to promote the personal interest of their organization. This ] wants to turn WP into a propaganda material for a highly questionable (possibly harmful) pseudo-Hindu cult while pretending to be an impartial concerned Wikipedian who only wants to enrich it. The situation is really bad. He has just been banned but as soon as he gets unbanned he begins to relentlessly vandalize the pages with irrelevant and immaterial cult propaganda once again. It is futile to try and protect the integrity of an article when someone like this person ], like the Energizer Bunny, keeps on reverting them and gets away with it without being taught a lesson. To see for yourself that ] is really an ordained teacher of the cult he keeps on inserting to the articles and not just a concerned Wikipedian with no alterior motive, please see the following website and scroll down a bit for Hamsacharya Dan Kogan. Please help. --] 12:21, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
*: RfI, in my view, isn't the place for this. I suggest ]. ]] 12:28, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

*{{vandal|Zerida}} -- This user repeatedly removes a certain category from the subcategory {{cl|Egyptian Americans}}. After several attempts to explain that user shouldn't impose political POVs failed, and since the user has at least one 3RR violation record, an admin has protected the category but not in its original state (mistakenly?). User's reason is that the subcategory remained several months until a user added the category, in addition to other comments in the talk page. - ]'''<sup>]</sup>''' 14:54, 18 March 2006 (UTC) *{{vandal|Zerida}} -- This user repeatedly removes a certain category from the subcategory {{cl|Egyptian Americans}}. After several attempts to explain that user shouldn't impose political POVs failed, and since the user has at least one 3RR violation record, an admin has protected the category but not in its original state (mistakenly?). User's reason is that the subcategory remained several months until a user added the category, in addition to other comments in the talk page. - ]'''<sup>]</sup>''' 14:54, 18 March 2006 (UTC)


Revision as of 12:39, 19 March 2006

Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General
Articles and content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards
    Shortcut
    • ]

    This page is intended to request administrator investigation of certain types of abuse only. Do not use this page until you read the policies, guidelines, and procedures. For obvious vandalism, see Administrator intervention against vandalism.

    Alerts that do not belong on this page will be removed without action on their contents or warning of their impropriety.

    To update this page, purge the cache. For alerts that have already been addressed, see the archives.

    Watchlist

    Read the policies, guidelines, and procedures before reporting. This list is for users or articles that you think should be watched (Do not report vandalism here; see WP:AIV). Do not list popular articles here, as they're already watched. Pages will be removed from the list and watchlisted by users in #vandalism-en-wp. Use the following format:

    * {{article|article name}} - brief explanation // ~~~~
    or * {{vandal|user name}} - brief explanation // ~~~~


    IP addresses

    Do not report obvious vandalism here; see Misplaced Pages:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Only report IP addresses that are engaged in complicated, deceptive vandalism that will require more than a few moments for an administrator to analyse. Please read the policies, guidelines, and procedures before reporting.

    Please use this format at the top of this section:

    * {{vandal|User_name}} -- Brief Description // ~~~~


    Registered users

    New requests

    Read the policies, guidelines, and procedures before reporting. Do not report content or user disputes here, unless you can provide links demonstrating a reasonable attempt at dispute resolution. Please use this format at the top of this section:

    * {{vandal|User_name}} -- Brief Description // ~~~~


    • Hamsacharya dan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) -- an ordained teacher of the Hamsa Yoga Sangh cult has been creating havoc for the past weeks by relentlessly inserting the name of his guru, his guru's book, quotes from his guru's book, and external link to their website on the following articles Kriya yoga, Mahavatar Babaji, Nath, and Adi Nath when the majority of the editors (actually all of them) who are experts on the subject agree that his guru is illegitimate, his inserts do not enrich (add anything substantial) to the already existing articles, and only aim to promote the personal interest of their organization. This person wants to turn WP into a propaganda material for a highly questionable (possibly harmful) pseudo-Hindu cult while pretending to be an impartial concerned Wikipedian who only wants to enrich it. The situation is really bad. He has just been banned but as soon as he gets unbanned he begins to relentlessly vandalize the pages with irrelevant and immaterial cult propaganda once again. It is futile to try and protect the integrity of an article when someone like this person Hamsacharya dan, like the Energizer Bunny, keeps on reverting them and gets away with it without being taught a lesson. To see for yourself that Hamsacharya dan is really an ordained teacher of the cult he keeps on inserting to the articles and not just a concerned Wikipedian with no alterior motive, please see the following website List of Authorized Teachers and scroll down a bit for Hamsacharya Dan Kogan. Please help. --No To Frauds 12:21, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

    The article is about the community I belong to "Khatri" from Punjab, India. Mr. Sanjay Mohan has been making racist comments full of hate. I read your help section on how to 'Edit" an article, but will the User: SanjayMohan be able to go back and undo the Edits I make?

    Please take action in some sort of way since you have the control on who can post information on your pages.

    The comments made by User: SanjayMohan include the following: > Khatris have sabotaged India and its civilization. Even the British were so upset, the Supreme Court of India ruled that "Punjabis are Liars" which is true to this day.

    > The Khatris from time immemorial have a history of treachory and treason against India and its peoples.

    > The legacy of Khatri community leaves a deep wound in Indian Psyche, where love and compassion was returned with vicious fraud, deceit and torture of India's greatest King and hero, Lord Ram.

    I find comments such as these very offensive and an attempt to pass false remarks as correct information to millions of people. Please advise as to what can be done about this User: SanjayMohan and if any legal action can be taken by the community leaders and lawyers.

    I tried to REVERT the page to an older version but was not allowed. You have frozen the page on the offensive version. PLEASE Revert back to version: 07:53, 14 March 2006 BY: 169.229.83.243

    Thank You

    • strothra (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - I would like to be able to the remove the vandalism tag from my talk page as the so-called vandalism which was attributed to myself was not vandalism but a dispute over a cited article on the website which I became involved in. The user who put the tag on my page did so after I reverted his delete of the article citation. I have removed myself from that conflict since he refused to enter into a discussion regarding the citation and it had occured when I was a brand new user. Since then I have been involved in Counter-vandalism efforts. // Strothra 04:30, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

    Under investigation

    The suspected sockpuppets include: User:J is me, User:The man from OZ, User:130.130.37.6, User:60.225.200.50 and User:60.225.202.61. Grant65 | Talk 11:13, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
    User:60.225.200.50 has also tried to portray User:CambridgeBayWeather as my sockpuppet. Grant65 | Talk 12:11, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
    Licinius has now disregarded the results of a poll at Talk:Football and insists on editing the article once again to reflect his/her own (eccentric) POV. I have asked an op to restore the page protection. Grant65 | Talk 11:35, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

    See also

    Category: