Misplaced Pages

User talk:Ironholds: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:23, 16 August 2011 view sourceDePiep (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users294,285 edits Speedy gone wrong: mass deletions re Bogdan Nagachop and ISO 15924← Previous edit Revision as of 10:35, 16 August 2011 view source Ironholds (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers79,705 edits Speedy gone wrong: mass deletions re Bogdan Nagachop and ISO 15924: sureNext edit →
Line 48: Line 48:
{Intruding into the conversation, without taking sides) ] says "Pages created by banned or blocked users in violation of their ban or block, <u>and which have no substantial edits by others.</u>" (emphasis added). A quick look at some of the templates shows edits by others, but were they "substantial"? Discuss... ]] 10:00, 16 August 2011 (UTC) {Intruding into the conversation, without taking sides) ] says "Pages created by banned or blocked users in violation of their ban or block, <u>and which have no substantial edits by others.</u>" (emphasis added). A quick look at some of the templates shows edits by others, but were they "substantial"? Discuss... ]] 10:00, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
:Saw that too (but could not check the history, as you could). The deleter did not, and not again now. I am writing a DRV now. -] (]) 10:23, 16 August 2011 (UTC) :Saw that too (but could not check the history, as you could). The deleter did not, and not again now. I am writing a DRV now. -] (]) 10:23, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
*Sure; please notify me when you've finished it. ] (]) 10:35, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:35, 16 August 2011

Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)

Archives

older archives
Archive 8 (October-November 2008)
Archive 9 (November-December2008)
Archive 9 (December 2008 - January 2009)
Archive 10 (January 2009 - February 2009)
Archive 11 (February 2009 - March 2009)
Archive 12 (April 2009 - May 2009
Archive 13 (May 2009 - June 2009
Archive 14 (June 2009 - July 2009
Archive 15 (July 2009 - August 2009
Archive 16 (August 2009 - October 2009
Archive 17 (October 2009 - November 2009
Archive 18 (November 2009 - December 2009
Archive 19 (January 2010 - February 2010
Archive 20 (February 2010 - March 2010
Archive 21 (March 2010)
Archive 22 (April 2010 - May 2010)
Archive 23 (May 2010 - June 2010)
Archive 24 (June 2010 - August 2010)
Archive 25 (August 2010 - December 2010)
Archive 26 (December 2010 - January 2011)
Archive 27 (January 2011 - February 2011)
Archive 28 (February 2011 - March 2011)]
Archive 29 (March 2011 - April 2011)
Archive 30 (April 2011 - June 2011)
Archive 31 (June 2011 - August 2011)


This user is one of the 400 most active English Wikipedians of all time.

Paul Lendvai

I will probably restore the protection later today given the discussion at WP:ANI#Admin engaging in edit war, violates three revert rule, then locks page. Dougweller (talk) 05:13, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Actually I've started a thread at ANI about this, given that discussion. Dougweller (talk) 08:41, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
And if my actions get support, then with two such incidents getting support we can then do something about WP:INVOLVED citing those actions. I'm hoping you will support such a change. Dougweller (talk) 09:23, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Lawyer up!

I made a suggestion at Talk:Main_Page#Errors_in_In_the_news regarding the Apple/Samsung legal dispute which has halted the sale and distribution of the Galaxy Tab into the EU. The front page calls it a patent dispute, whereas the injunction is over a community design. Is the current hook incorrect? - hahnchen 12:38, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Now replied; industrial design right != patent. Ironholds (talk) 13:00, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Awards and prizes

Please be advised of Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Awards and prizes.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:57, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Replied. Ironholds (talk) 01:20, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
Please see response at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Awards and prizes.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:16, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Mail

Hello, Ironholds. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.— Pascal (talk) 20:34, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
Yup; I've got rather delayed by RL shit, but I should have everything to you by Saturday at the latest. Sorry! Ironholds (talk) 21:30, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
Groovy. Hope It didn't seem like I was pestering you. Pascal (talk) 22:04, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
Damn that sucks. I hope you get better soon, I really do. I'm basking the glory of my summer break from uni, and becoming addicted to wikipedia is not how I was planning to spend it... Pascal (talk) 22:14, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
Hah! I know the feeling :). Ironholds (talk) 22:27, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Re:The Good-Morrow

There are still three points (the first and the last two) to which you have not reponded- any chance I can hear your thoughts on those issues? Those three were really the big ones. J Milburn (talk) 16:33, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy gone wrong: mass deletions re Bogdan Nagachop and ISO 15924

You deleted {{ISO 15924/alias}} {{ISO 15924}} {{ISO 15924/name}} {{ISO 15924/numeric}}, for db-g5 (Bogdan Nagachop). But currently they are ingrained into a set of transcluded (sub-) templates, which functioned well. I request you undo the reverts. Then, I am quite astonished that these templates are deleted without proper usage check. -DePiep (talk) 09:18, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

In a word, "no". Useful or not useful, these are templates created by a banned user in violation of his editing restrictions - they were deleted for a reason. Ironholds (talk) 09:46, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
(edit conflict)This shows where it went wrong: Khojki (infobox), Category:User Cyrl.
Invited User_talk:Gfoley4 to this discussion, they were doing the speedies too. -DePiep (talk) 09:52, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
At least you could temp restore them, so I can copy good code. -DePiep (talk) 09:52, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

{Intruding into the conversation, without taking sides) WP:CSD#G5 says "Pages created by banned or blocked users in violation of their ban or block, and which have no substantial edits by others." (emphasis added). A quick look at some of the templates shows edits by others, but were they "substantial"? Discuss... Bencherlite 10:00, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Saw that too (but could not check the history, as you could). The deleter did not, and not again now. I am writing a DRV now. -DePiep (talk) 10:23, 16 August 2011 (UTC)