| Revision as of 00:23, 8 March 2006 editTarkovsky~enwiki (talk | contribs)475 edits →Other countries: style← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:55, 19 March 2006 edit undoSmackBot (talk | contribs)3,734,324 editsm UK -> article United Kingdom - and/or general fixes using AWBNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| ==Controversy== | ==Controversy== | ||
| In the United States and many other jurisdictions, dividend payments are considered ordinary income and are taxed as such, the same as if the taxpayer had earned the income working at a job. Depending on the jurisdiction, interest income, collected rents, or other "]" may also be taxed. It is the subject of recurring debate as to whether or not these taxes should be eliminated. | In the United States and many other jurisdictions, dividend payments are considered ordinary income and are taxed as such, the same as if the taxpayer had earned the income working at a job. Depending on the jurisdiction, interest income, collected rents, or other "]" may also be taxed. It is the subject of recurring debate as to whether or not these taxes should be eliminated. | ||
| ===Arguments for abolition=== | ===Arguments for abolition=== | ||
| Abolitionists argue that a dividend tax amounts to unfair "]", in the sense that the company has already paid an income tax on these funds. Some even argue for the elimination of all taxes on investment income including ] and ]. | Abolitionists argue that a dividend tax amounts to unfair "]", in the sense that the company has already paid an income tax on these funds. Some even argue for the elimination of all taxes on investment income including ] and ]. | ||
| Line 12: | Line 10: | ||
| ===Arguments against abolition=== | ===Arguments against abolition=== | ||
| Opponents of elimination claim that it is unfair to tax ] generated through active work at a higher rate than ] generated through less active means or that companies may not have paid their full share of income tax. | Opponents of elimination claim that it is unfair to tax ] generated through active work at a higher rate than ] generated through less active means or that companies may not have paid their full share of income tax. | ||
| ==United States== | ==United States== | ||
| In 2003, President ] proposed to eliminate the U.S. dividend tax saying that "double taxation is bad for our economy... wrong... falls especially hard on ] people". He also argued that while "it's fair to tax a company's profits, it's not fair to double-tax by taxing the ] on the same profits." | In 2003, President ] proposed to eliminate the U.S. dividend tax saying that "double taxation is bad for our economy... wrong... falls especially hard on ] people". He also argued that while "it's fair to tax a company's profits, it's not fair to double-tax by taxing the ] on the same profits." | ||
| Line 23: | Line 19: | ||
| ==Canada== | ==Canada== | ||
| In ], there is double taxation of dividends, but tax policy attempts to compensate for this through the Dividend Tax Credit or DTC for personal income in dividends from Canadian corporations. | In ], there is double taxation of dividends, but tax policy attempts to compensate for this through the Dividend Tax Credit or DTC for personal income in dividends from Canadian corporations. | ||
| An increase to the DTC was ] in the fall of 2005 by Liberal finance minister ] just prior to the fall of the Liberal minority government, in conjunction with the announcement that Canadian ] would not become subject to double taxation as had been feared. Effective tax rates on dividends will now range from as low as 3% to over 30% depending on income level and different provincial tax rates and credits. | An increase to the DTC was ] in the fall of 2005 by Liberal finance minister ] just prior to the fall of the Liberal minority government, in conjunction with the announcement that Canadian ] would not become subject to double taxation as had been feared. Effective tax rates on dividends will now range from as low as 3% to over 30% depending on income level and different provincial tax rates and credits. | ||
| ==Other countries== | ==Other countries== | ||
| Line 32: | Line 28: | ||
| In ] there is a tax of 5% on the dividends with no double taxation. | In ] there is a tax of 5% on the dividends with no double taxation. | ||
| In the ], dividends are taxable at special rates and are paid with a notional tax credit that the recipient can then offset against his/her personal income tax bill. The tax credit represents the tax that the company has already paid on the profits represented by the dividend. Although the system is rather complex because of its special 'investment income' rates, the upshot of these and the tax credits is that dividends are not double-taxed. | In the ], dividends are taxable at special rates and are paid with a notional tax credit that the recipient can then offset against his/her personal income tax bill. The tax credit represents the tax that the company has already paid on the profits represented by the dividend. Although the system is rather complex because of its special 'investment income' rates, the upshot of these and the tax credits is that dividends are not double-taxed. | ||
| In ] dividends are taxed at the recipient's marginal tax rate (up to 48.5% as at January 2006). Australia has a ] system which allows ]s to be attached to dividends. This allows recipients of franked dividends to impute (or credit) the corporate tax paid by the paying company. A recipient of a fully franked dividend on the top marginal tax rate will effectively pay only about 26% tax on the cash amount of the dividend . | In ] dividends are taxed at the recipient's marginal tax rate (up to 48.5% as at January 2006). Australia has a ] system which allows ]s to be attached to dividends. This allows recipients of franked dividends to impute (or credit) the corporate tax paid by the paying company. A recipient of a fully franked dividend on the top marginal tax rate will effectively pay only about 26% tax on the cash amount of the dividend . | ||
Revision as of 17:55, 19 March 2006
A dividend tax is an income tax on money paid to the owners of a company through dividend payments.
Controversy
In the United States and many other jurisdictions, dividend payments are considered ordinary income and are taxed as such, the same as if the taxpayer had earned the income working at a job. Depending on the jurisdiction, interest income, collected rents, or other "unearned income" may also be taxed. It is the subject of recurring debate as to whether or not these taxes should be eliminated.
Arguments for abolition
Abolitionists argue that a dividend tax amounts to unfair "double taxation", in the sense that the company has already paid an income tax on these funds. Some even argue for the elimination of all taxes on investment income including interest income and capital gains.
Abolitionists claim that more than half of all wage-earners already pay little in income taxes (not counting social security "taxes") and are "probably" harmed the most by double taxation: a company wanting to raise capital must decide between issuing new debt or issuing new equity; the differing tax treatment encourages the company to issue debt and the company becomes highly leveraged. Later during an inevitable economic downturn, the company -- not being able to bear the risk of missing an interest payment -- will be quick to lay-off workers. By comparison, abolitionists claim, a company has more flexibility with regard to dividend payments.
Arguments against abolition
Opponents of elimination claim that it is unfair to tax income generated through active work at a higher rate than income generated through less active means or that companies may not have paid their full share of income tax.
United States
In 2003, President George W. Bush proposed to eliminate the U.S. dividend tax saying that "double taxation is bad for our economy... wrong... falls especially hard on retired people". He also argued that while "it's fair to tax a company's profits, it's not fair to double-tax by taxing the shareholder on the same profits."
Soon after, the Congress passed the a bill which included some of the cuts Bush requested and which he signed into law on May 28, 2003. Under the new law dividends are taxed at a 15% rate for most individual taxpayers. Dividends received by low income individuals are taxed at a 5% rate until December 31, 2007 and become fully untaxed in 2008. These provisions are set to expire on January 1, 2009.
Canada
In Canada, there is double taxation of dividends, but tax policy attempts to compensate for this through the Dividend Tax Credit or DTC for personal income in dividends from Canadian corporations. An increase to the DTC was announced in the fall of 2005 by Liberal finance minister Ralph Goodale just prior to the fall of the Liberal minority government, in conjunction with the announcement that Canadian income trusts would not become subject to double taxation as had been feared. Effective tax rates on dividends will now range from as low as 3% to over 30% depending on income level and different provincial tax rates and credits.
Other countries
In Finland, a double taxation will be in use as of 2005. Income tax is 29% for a stockowner and the total tax will be around 50%.
In the Netherlands there is a tax of 1.2 % per year on the value of the share, regardless of the dividend, as part of the flat tax on savings and investments.
In Romania there is a tax of 5% on the dividends with no double taxation.
In the UK, dividends are taxable at special rates and are paid with a notional tax credit that the recipient can then offset against his/her personal income tax bill. The tax credit represents the tax that the company has already paid on the profits represented by the dividend. Although the system is rather complex because of its special 'investment income' rates, the upshot of these and the tax credits is that dividends are not double-taxed.
In Australia dividends are taxed at the recipient's marginal tax rate (up to 48.5% as at January 2006). Australia has a Dividend Imputation system which allows franking credits to be attached to dividends. This allows recipients of franked dividends to impute (or credit) the corporate tax paid by the paying company. A recipient of a fully franked dividend on the top marginal tax rate will effectively pay only about 26% tax on the cash amount of the dividend .