| Revision as of 05:01, 20 March 2006 editSevera (talk | contribs)15,365 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:03, 20 March 2006 edit undoSevera (talk | contribs)15,365 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| '''High priority:''' | '''High priority:''' | ||
| * Spend two weeks engaging in circular, POV-prone debates over a single word whilst ignoring the to-do list, "Progress Report II," and all calls toward productiveness and article-improvement. | * Spend two weeks engaging in circular, POV-prone debates over a single word or in niggling POV witch-hunts whilst ignoring the to-do list, "Progress Report II," and all calls toward productiveness and article-improvement. | ||
| '''Low priority:''' | '''Low priority:''' | ||
Revision as of 05:03, 20 March 2006
High priority:
- Spend two weeks engaging in circular, POV-prone debates over a single word or in niggling POV witch-hunts whilst ignoring the to-do list, "Progress Report II," and all calls toward productiveness and article-improvement.
Low priority:
- Harmonize (merge) History of abortion lead with new section, so they are the same informative overview of the subject. (with details going into the sub article).
- Properly source the majority of information under "Forms of abortion" and "Health effects."
- Source and write a sub-section on forced abortion for "Social issues."
- Discuss creation of "Historical perspectives" topic under "Abortion debate."
- Rework the Incidence table (see thread "Clarify the percentages?" in Archive 17 of Talk:Abortion).
- Add public opinion data from more diverse countries.
- Pictures.
In particular, an image of pro-choice demonstrators for "Abortion debate."