| Revision as of 21:50, 23 August 2011 editMadCow257 (talk | contribs)436 edits →United States resolution on the 90th anniversary of the Latvian Republic: Delete← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:07, 23 August 2011 edit undoRussavia (talk | contribs)78,741 edits add comment for noteNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| * '''Delete''' Unless per nominator unless coverage is found ] (]) 21:50, 23 August 2011 (UTC) | * '''Delete''' Unless per nominator unless coverage is found ] (]) 21:50, 23 August 2011 (UTC) | ||
| :'''Comment''' Just wanted to make the comment as well, that I placed the issue tags on the article, and also placed info on the talk page. It was after doing this, that I searched for sources which would give it encyclopaedic notability (rather than ]) and failed to find anything of substance that would have stopped me from putting this up at AfD. --] <sup>]</sup> 22:07, 23 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:07, 23 August 2011
United States resolution on the 90th anniversary of the Latvian Republic
- United States resolution on the 90th anniversary of the Latvian Republic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article covers something thast simply is not notable. It suffers from quite a few issues, but first and foremost, there is next to no scholarly discourse on the actual subject, apart from the standard brief news reporting. The actual resolution may warrant at most a line in Occupation of the Baltic States, but as a stand alone article, within an encyclopaedic setting the notability just isn't there, demonstrated by the lack of sourcing to independent, reliable sources. Russavia 21:18, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latvia-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:24, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:24, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Misplaced Pages is not here to repeat the text of every resolution of every legislature in the world. Unless there is substantial third party coverage of the resolution, it fails WP:NOTABILITY. TFD (talk) 21:31, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Unless per nominator unless coverage is found MadCow257 (talk) 21:50, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Just wanted to make the comment as well, that I placed the issue tags on the article, and also placed info on the talk page. It was after doing this, that I searched for sources which would give it encyclopaedic notability (rather than WP:NOTNEWS) and failed to find anything of substance that would have stopped me from putting this up at AfD. --Russavia 22:07, 23 August 2011 (UTC)