| Revision as of 20:37, 6 June 2011 editJtrainor (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,011 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:34, 24 August 2011 edit undoPontificalibus (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers21,086 edits AfDsNext edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| Hi! Just wanted to explain quickly why I removed the Disability template from the ] page you added. It's been an on and off debate whether the page should have it, but an informal ] came to the conclusion that it should stay off the page. The basic reason came down to that though the physical inabilty to hear can be considered a disability (though some would say otherwise; a debate for another time, I'm sure) Deaf Culture is more about the culture that revolves around the Deaf Community. I'd be more than happy to elaborate a bit on this topic if you'd like. ] (]) 18:51, 6 June 2011 (UTC) | Hi! Just wanted to explain quickly why I removed the Disability template from the ] page you added. It's been an on and off debate whether the page should have it, but an informal ] came to the conclusion that it should stay off the page. The basic reason came down to that though the physical inabilty to hear can be considered a disability (though some would say otherwise; a debate for another time, I'm sure) Deaf Culture is more about the culture that revolves around the Deaf Community. I'd be more than happy to elaborate a bit on this topic if you'd like. ] (]) 18:51, 6 June 2011 (UTC) | ||
| :I disagree, but I don't really have the time or energy to start a fight over this. ] (]) 20:37, 6 June 2011 (UTC) | :I disagree, but I don't really have the time or energy to start a fight over this. ] (]) 20:37, 6 June 2011 (UTC) | ||
| ==Your last two AfD nominations== | |||
| Please read ] before considering nominating articles for deletion. In short, an unreferenced article won't be deleted on notability grounds if the sources can be found easily via a search. I find it generally saves everyone's time if I do a quick search for sources before considering nominating, with Google Books and their news archives being most useful. --] (]) | |||
Revision as of 17:34, 24 August 2011
Welcome!
The Rules
- Be cool to me and I'll be cool to you. If you show up here and act like a jerk expect to have your posts removed.
- No anon IPs. Log in if you want to talk to me.
- No puppets. Self-explanatory.
- No Homers
- Don't randomly template me instead of attempting to actually talk to me. This is 'shit and run' and will get you nowhere. Especially don't template me about being close to 3RR-- I am quite capable of counting to three and assuming that I can't will most definitely be taken as a personal attack.
- Catch-all prove 'em wrong clause:
- 5a) Yes it is
- 5b) No it isn't
- 5c) Yes
- 5d) No
Deaf Culture
Hi! Just wanted to explain quickly why I removed the Disability template from the Deaf culture page you added. It's been an on and off debate whether the page should have it, but an informal straw poll came to the conclusion that it should stay off the page. The basic reason came down to that though the physical inabilty to hear can be considered a disability (though some would say otherwise; a debate for another time, I'm sure) Deaf Culture is more about the culture that revolves around the Deaf Community. I'd be more than happy to elaborate a bit on this topic if you'd like. Deafgeek (talk) 18:51, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- I disagree, but I don't really have the time or energy to start a fight over this. Jtrainor (talk) 20:37, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Your last two AfD nominations
Please read WP:BEFORE before considering nominating articles for deletion. In short, an unreferenced article won't be deleted on notability grounds if the sources can be found easily via a search. I find it generally saves everyone's time if I do a quick search for sources before considering nominating, with Google Books and their news archives being most useful. --Pontificalibus (talk)