| Revision as of 05:04, 21 March 2006 view sourceGoldToeMarionette (talk | contribs)120 edits Response to No Harm← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:05, 21 March 2006 view source GoldToeMarionette (talk | contribs)120 edits Relocate No Harm and response to UserTalkNext edit → | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| :Thank You. | :Thank You. | ||
| ::I don't see that anyone did you any harm by investigating and revealing who you were sockpuppeting for. Your behavior was somewhat disruptive. Please don't spam pages trying to drum up votes in the future. ] 13:40, 20 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| This is the wrong standard to apply. That is the point I am trying to make. If there is no perceived harm, or if someone does not like something should not be the standards that Admins operate by. The standard for their administrative actions should be an actual violation of Misplaced Pages ]. | |||
| I was unable to find "somewhat disruptive" in Misplaced Pages Policy. I don't know if anyone can ] a policy that has been violated by this account. | |||
| In terms of harm there absolutely has been some done. The mere fact that ] investigated this sockpuppet implies that Misplaced Pages Policy was violated. The action of a official of Misplaced Pages to treat as guilty, without an offense being committed, harms my reputation. The sockpuppet reveal is not the harm, the act of investigating it is. ] 05:04, 21 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:05, 21 March 2006
From my username it is obvious. Isn't it?
This account is a Sockpuppet. It is actually one of nine. I do my best to be a good Wikipedian. I am not the most advanced user, however I would like to have faith in this resource. By my read of Misplaced Pages Policies and Guidelines it is just fine to have a Sockpuppet. I hope you agree that SockPuppets are fine. Some users don't agree.
Ohnoitsjamie and Android79 didn't like this account being a SockPuppet. They decided to report it despite there being no violation of Misplaced Pages Policies and Guidelines. The truly disappointing thing is that through the CheckUser Jayjg agreed to investigate. Jayjg revealed my most recent sockpuppet to the world. Thankfully, my root account has not been comprimised.
I would appreciate if you would truly review Misplaced Pages Policies and Guidelines to see if this account violated any of them. I have been told by a few that they didn't like what this account has done. However, none has cited a policy that has been violated by this account. I ask, why should it have been investigated through CheckUser. Please let me know your thoughts. The honest Wikipedian thoughts, not ones blinded by hatred of SockPuppets.
I am writing this here to see a few things:
Get comments on Admins that may have overstepped their bounds and taken action even though it does not violate Misplaced Pages policy.
If an editor with CheckUser privilege will try to find my other identities.
If Admins will comment on taking action based upon actual Misplaced Pages Policies and Guidelines instead of what they personally don't like.
If Jayjg will apologize for completing the Checkuser investigation.
If Android79 will apologize for requesting it in the first place.
If Ohnoitsjamie will apologize for wanting to label this account as a SockPuppet.
If someone will try to smite this account just for reading this and not liking what they read.
If anyone will purge every record of this SockPuppet account being revealed for the sake of what is right.
If someone can bolster my faith in Misplaced Pages.
- Thank You.