| Revision as of 15:24, 30 August 2011 view sourceEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,202 edits →Proposed amendment: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:49, 1 September 2011 view source EdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,202 edits →A request to lift your interaction ban with Russavia has been filed: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
| See ] for a draft of an amendment to EEML and ARBRB which could be submitted through ]. The proposal would lift the interaction ban between you and Russavia. If you have an opinion, you can reply here. If you interpret your interaction ban with Russavia as not allowing you to reply on the wiki, then you can send me some email. (I personally would not impose any sanctions for reasonable on-wiki discussion about this or similar topics). ] (]) 15:24, 30 August 2011 (UTC) | See ] for a draft of an amendment to EEML and ARBRB which could be submitted through ]. The proposal would lift the interaction ban between you and Russavia. If you have an opinion, you can reply here. If you interpret your interaction ban with Russavia as not allowing you to reply on the wiki, then you can send me some email. (I personally would not impose any sanctions for reasonable on-wiki discussion about this or similar topics). ] (]) 15:24, 30 August 2011 (UTC) | ||
| == A request to lift your interaction ban with Russavia has been filed == | |||
| Please see ]. You are invited to add your own statement there. Since we have discussed this previously, my assumption is that you would favor lifting the ban. Thank you, ] (]) 18:49, 1 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:49, 1 September 2011
- -
This user has grown tired of the battleground bullshit....
The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011
Karen Drambjan
I am not yet seeing that other editors would support your proposal at WP:AE#Russavia. Petri Krohn is against putting Category:Far-left politics on the article. Do you see him proposing it be in a subcategory? I don't think he took that step. And where is the evidence that any other editors want such a category on the article? Collect is not definite on what he prefers. Diffs would be helpful. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 01:20, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
- Your AE complaint has been closed with no action against Russavia. In the Result section I've explained how I think the interaction ban should work. Note that there is a different way of setting up interaction bans proposed by T. Canens. It is possible that the T. Canens 'strict liability ban' might be easier to enforce and easier for the participants to live with. This is an idea that might be considered for the future. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 04:42, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of United States resolution on the 90th anniversary of the Latvian Republic for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article United States resolution on the 90th anniversary of the Latvian Republic is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/United States resolution on the 90th anniversary of the Latvian Republic until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Russavia 21:18, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Category:Far-left politics
I would appreciate if you would give consideration to the CfD and investigate whether the subject represents a meaningful topic. I have searched Google books and Google scholar but cannot find any consistent use of the term. I would be appreciative if you could show that there is a consistent definition. TFD (talk) 04:26, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Proposed amendment
See User talk:EdJohnston#Draft amendment for a draft of an amendment to EEML and ARBRB which could be submitted through WP:A/R/A. The proposal would lift the interaction ban between you and Russavia. If you have an opinion, you can reply here. If you interpret your interaction ban with Russavia as not allowing you to reply on the wiki, then you can send me some email. (I personally would not impose any sanctions for reasonable on-wiki discussion about this or similar topics). EdJohnston (talk) 15:24, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
A request to lift your interaction ban with Russavia has been filed
Please see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment#Request to amend prior case: Russavia-Biophys. You are invited to add your own statement there. Since we have discussed this previously, my assumption is that you would favor lifting the ban. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:49, 1 September 2011 (UTC)