User talk:Dinner for three: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 01:54, 4 September 2011 editKwamikagami (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Template editors475,358 edits →September 2011 ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:12, 4 September 2011 edit undoDinner for three (talk \| contribs)312 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 5:		Line 5:

	:I have to agree. Since Macedonian Slavic is Bulgarian, why are we saying it twice? Anyway, this would seem to be the kind of thing to discuss, esp. given the nationalist problems of the Balkans. If you don't like the way it's handled, I suggest you try ]. I'm going to revert your edits now, as I see not only redundancy but the deletion of Greek from towns in Greece, which would seem to be a bit extreme no matter what the etymology. If I've reverted things you did that aren't in this vein, feel free to restore them, but otherwise please discuss this rather than ]ring. — ] (]) 01:50, 4 September 2011 (UTC)		:I have to agree. Since Macedonian Slavic is Bulgarian, why are we saying it twice? Anyway, this would seem to be the kind of thing to discuss, esp. given the nationalist problems of the Balkans. If you don't like the way it's handled, I suggest you try ]. I'm going to revert your edits now, as I see not only redundancy but the deletion of Greek from towns in Greece, which would seem to be a bit extreme no matter what the etymology. If I've reverted things you did that aren't in this vein, feel free to restore them, but otherwise please discuss this rather than ]ring. — ] (]) 01:50, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

			Oh my mother, reverted to last version by Lunch for Two?? OK I will free to restore them but why I have to waste my time for this nonsense? Better take your attention at such ] you revert, and such ]. All these covered POV-pushing by Lunch for Two should be reverted immideately and the reverts in such case are inescapable. To take Latin transliterations in every village where Cyrilic exists is not so easy and fast and they should get back in the page too. The only I want from you is to revert priror to Lunch for two edits, because most of them are covered POV disruption, source falsifications, etc.] (]) 18:12, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:12, 4 September 2011

September 2011

Please stop your string of reverts, before this issue escalates into an edit war. Given that you are making so many edits in such a short period of time it makes sense to discuss the issues, so as to not make the changes look like vandalism from a newly registered account. On what basis have your 50 or so edits to places in Greece been made? Lunch for Two (talk) 11:40, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

I really get enough to revert your vandalism today, falsification of sources, etc. If you check the names in both Bulgarian and Macedonian Misplaced Pages in the villages you revert you will see that they are the same. What I did in Greece was updating where Bulgarian names already existed and never adding mew ones.

I have to agree. Since Macedonian Slavic *is* Bulgarian, why are we saying it twice? Anyway, this would seem to be the kind of thing to discuss, esp. given the nationalist problems of the Balkans. If you don't like the way it's handled, I suggest you try WP:dispute resolution. I'm going to revert your edits now, as I see not only redundancy but the deletion of Greek from towns in Greece, which would seem to be a bit extreme no matter what the etymology. If I've reverted things you did that aren't in this vein, feel free to restore them, but otherwise please discuss this rather than WP:edit warring. — kwami (talk) 01:50, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Oh my mother, reverted to last version by Lunch for Two?? OK I will free to restore them but why I have to waste my time for this nonsense? Better take your attention at such you revert, and such . All these covered POV-pushing by Lunch for Two should be reverted immideately and the reverts in such case are inescapable. To take Latin transliterations in every village where Cyrilic exists is not so easy and fast and they should get back in the page too. The only I want from you is to revert priror to Lunch for two edits, because most of them are covered POV disruption, source falsifications, etc.Dinner for three (talk) 18:12, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:54, 4 September 2011 editKwamikagami (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Template editors475,358 edits →September 2011 ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:12, 4 September 2011 edit undoDinner for three (talk \| contribs)312 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 5:		Line 5:

	:I have to agree. Since Macedonian Slavic is Bulgarian, why are we saying it twice? Anyway, this would seem to be the kind of thing to discuss, esp. given the nationalist problems of the Balkans. If you don't like the way it's handled, I suggest you try ]. I'm going to revert your edits now, as I see not only redundancy but the deletion of Greek from towns in Greece, which would seem to be a bit extreme no matter what the etymology. If I've reverted things you did that aren't in this vein, feel free to restore them, but otherwise please discuss this rather than ]ring. — ] (]) 01:50, 4 September 2011 (UTC)		:I have to agree. Since Macedonian Slavic is Bulgarian, why are we saying it twice? Anyway, this would seem to be the kind of thing to discuss, esp. given the nationalist problems of the Balkans. If you don't like the way it's handled, I suggest you try ]. I'm going to revert your edits now, as I see not only redundancy but the deletion of Greek from towns in Greece, which would seem to be a bit extreme no matter what the etymology. If I've reverted things you did that aren't in this vein, feel free to restore them, but otherwise please discuss this rather than ]ring. — ] (]) 01:50, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

			Oh my mother, reverted to last version by Lunch for Two?? OK I will free to restore them but why I have to waste my time for this nonsense? Better take your attention at such ] you revert, and such ]. All these covered POV-pushing by Lunch for Two should be reverted immideately and the reverts in such case are inescapable. To take Latin transliterations in every village where Cyrilic exists is not so easy and fast and they should get back in the page too. The only I want from you is to revert priror to Lunch for two edits, because most of them are covered POV disruption, source falsifications, etc.] (]) 18:12, 4 September 2011 (UTC)