Misplaced Pages

User talk:VS6507: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:07, 6 September 2011 editMichaelQSchmidt (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users60,150 edits inre Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Missing Pieces (film): thanks← Previous edit Revision as of 17:52, 6 September 2011 edit undoSiddhantss10 (talk | contribs)146 edits Hi! Sorry for the mistake.: new sectionNext edit →
Line 65: Line 65:
:That's probably because you do not have font named ''Bickham Script Pro Semibold'', which is unreadable at lower pixel sizes. I'm sorry, do not have a solution :( ]<sup> ] ]</sup> 14:45, 5 September 2011 (UTC) :That's probably because you do not have font named ''Bickham Script Pro Semibold'', which is unreadable at lower pixel sizes. I'm sorry, do not have a solution :( ]<sup> ] ]</sup> 14:45, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
:: The solution is not to use Bickham Script Pro Semibold in your sig. :-) <font style="bold italic" color="7C0500">Harry the Dog </font>] 14:49, 5 September 2011 (UTC) :: The solution is not to use Bickham Script Pro Semibold in your sig. :-) <font style="bold italic" color="7C0500">Harry the Dog </font>] 14:49, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

== Hi! Sorry for the mistake. ==

This is in reference to of mine. I'm really sorry for committing the error; but it was unintentional. Actually, I intended to copy the Wiki code from my Discussion page to that of and make the necessary edits. But in a hurry, I forgot to edit the username! That resulted in the reverting of my edit. Sorry again! --] (]) 17:52, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:52, 6 September 2011

This page may contain some text written in the Serbian language.

Archives
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Dynamic IP

Hello. This is a dynamic IP address. I therefore did not make the edits you're referring to. It would be better if you only post warnings like that to registered users. 78.143.224.158 (talk) 18:02, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Re: Center / Centre

"Centre" is a perfectly legitimate British spelling of the word, and also please read WP:ENGVAR. --Joy (talk) 14:03, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Re

Is there a specific reason why you reverted my edit? Please, check on the link before you revert things carelessly. I was redirecting the link Sean O'Sullivan to Sean O'Sullivan (baseball) in Vin Mazzaro, a baseball player's page. Is there anything wrong with that? --Vzomg 15:50, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for the apology. :) --Vzomg 15:55, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for catching that vandalism on my talk page! Sophus Bie 15:57, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Sophus Bie has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.


To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Oh, no problem, that's my job :) Alex 16:10, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Re: Locking my user and talk page

I have semi-protected your userpage as per your request, however will not protect your user talk page. User talk pages are the primary means for other editors to contact you - if this page is protected, that prevents good-faith anonymous editors from getting in touch with you. In cases of severe vandalism, you can request temporary protection at WP:RFPP, however in looking at the history I don't see that this is the case right now. Hersfold 23:05, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Why this reversion?

Hi. Why did you make this reversion of a relevant reply to a question at WP:REFUND#Monolith Software? JohnCD (talk) 21:47, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Well, my system is now working much slower than usual, also the script is bugging right now.
That edit did not pass Huggle edit filter (user is not in whitelist, script didn't ask me "Are you sure...?", and, at last, revision was yellow marked which means potential unconstructive editing), and it first looks like an advertisement (copy + paste "We are the best company ..."). That could be explained as my try to revert (those the biggest) vandalism as quickly as possible. But, my slow computer (plus script bugging) could not work that fast. I tried to rely on my script, and therefore I didn't invest enough time in reading edits. :( But, I've, also, reverted most common vandalism, tests and other unconstructive edits. Regards, Alex 22:00, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

This edit of yours was clearly a mistake. Please try to be more careful. Michael Hardy (talk) 21:49, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes,   means space. Am I right? Considering this, I will take a mid-wiki break. I hope I will be in better situation (in aspect of computer speed) until then. Best regards! Alex 22:04, 30 August 2011 (UTC)


Thanks Alex. Herbolzheim (talk) 23:08, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

inre Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Missing Pieces (film)

My opinion in this case, was that WP:INCUBATION for something that can be worked on by other while "waiting in the wings" out of article space could be better than an outright deletion. At the above AFD you wrote that you concurred with my comments. Might you wish to <s>strikethrough</s> your delete and/or change it to "Incubate"? Schmidt, 22:26, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

OK, but what's the different? If ever occur a reliable source (what I do not believe), we would easy re-create the article. Alex 11:51, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for updating your AFD comment. Deletion carries a negative onus, and recreation of a deleted article (specially if done by an inexperienced editor) could have it "G4" speedied and re-enforce that negativity. The Incubator is a "holding area" that allows continued collaborative work so that when ready the whole thing can be returned to mainspace with its edit history intact. As I have experience with the Incubator, I can assure you, there is far less work required to tune up something that is simply biding its time, than that needed to recreate a new article from scratch. Schmidt, 03:07, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Rintsikoita ja luudanvarsia

Hello. I have removed the CSD tag that you placed on the page Rintsikoita ja luudanvarsia because it does not appear to me to be a test page. It appears to be an article about a children's book written in the Finnish langauge. The CSD criteria that relate to notability do not apply to books, so if you still think it should be deleted I think you'll have to send it to PROD or AfD. Please let me know if you think that I am mistaken. Thank you. James500 (talk) 13:54, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

your sig

Hello! I noticed your signature is rather distracting, in that the "Alex" portion is quite big. This disrupts the flow of the surrounding text. I see that Misplaced Pages:Signatures#Appearance and color supports me in saying size tags should be avoided where it has this effect. Could you please make it a little smaller? Thanks, sonia01:26, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

That's probably because you do not have font named Bickham Script Pro Semibold, which is unreadable at lower pixel sizes. I'm sorry, do not have a solution :( Alex 14:45, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
The solution is not to use Bickham Script Pro Semibold in your sig. :-) Harry the Dog WOOF 14:49, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi! Sorry for the mistake.

This is in reference to this edit of mine. I'm really sorry for committing the error; but it was unintentional. Actually, I intended to copy the Wiki code from my Discussion page to that of and make the necessary edits. But in a hurry, I forgot to edit the username! That resulted in the reverting of my edit. Sorry again! --Siddhant Bhaware (talk) 17:52, 6 September 2011 (UTC)