| Revision as of 04:55, 13 September 2011 editElizium23 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers66,953 editsm →Block of 76.31.236.91← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:46, 13 September 2011 edit undo76.31.236.91 (talk) →Elizium23: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
| The reason these IP editors are being blocked on sight is explained at ]. Please see my links there to the forum posts where meat puppets are actively coordinating their attack on Misplaced Pages articles. It is abusive, as their intent is to insert poorly sourced contentious material in the articles ], ], and (probably soon) ]. Our efforts to contain the damage has been met with derision, verbal abuse, personal attacks and attempted ] from the various editors involved. Please reconsider your unblock. ] (]) 04:55, 13 September 2011 (UTC) | The reason these IP editors are being blocked on sight is explained at ]. Please see my links there to the forum posts where meat puppets are actively coordinating their attack on Misplaced Pages articles. It is abusive, as their intent is to insert poorly sourced contentious material in the articles ], ], and (probably soon) ]. Our efforts to contain the damage has been met with derision, verbal abuse, personal attacks and attempted ] from the various editors involved. Please reconsider your unblock. ] (]) 04:55, 13 September 2011 (UTC) | ||
| == Elizium23 == | |||
| I have posted inline responses to each of Elizium23's points. He has obviously been arguing this SOMEWHERE as I was able to google his copy/paste boilerplate response and he has an area under his user space (http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Elizium23/The_Dating_Guy) where he seems to keep it around. It's almost completely irrelevant: he's arguing that merely including the fact that Sohmer made the allegations somehow violates NPOV or "verifiability", he deems the Kickstarter page to be verifiable enough for status of the animated series but not for whether Sohmer made the statements, he says Sohmer's own webpage/forum posts aren't "reliable" to verify whether the Kickstarter page is Sohmer's or something like that... essentially he threw a big-ass wall of text and seems to just be playing obstructionist. | |||
| I don't get it. | |||
| If he is looking for a Teletoon response to Sohmer's allegations, I was able to find one here: | |||
| http://webcomicoverlook.com/2011/05/25/teletoon-responds-to-the-licd-discussion/ | |||
| For NPOV reasons, it seems that should be included as a "Teletoon disputes the allegations." Assuming that this can be used as a source.] (]) 12:46, 13 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:46, 13 September 2011
IMPORTANT NOTE: ADD YOUR MESSAGES AT THE BOTTOM, NOT THE TOP. OTHERWISE I MIGHT NOT SEE THEM. Because of their length, the previous discussions on this page have been archived. If further archiving is needed, see Misplaced Pages:How to archive a talk page.
Previous discussions:
- Archive 1 (April 22 2004 – September 28 2005):
- Archive 2 (September 28 2005 – February 4 2006)
- Archive 3 (February 5 2006 – May 22 2006)
- Archive 4 (May 22 2006 – August 17 2006)
- Archive 5 (August 17 2006 – October 17 2006))
- Archive 6 (October 17 2006 – February 20 2007)
- Archive 7 (February 20 2007 – September 18 2007)
- Archive 8 (September 18 2007 – March 3 2008)
- Archive 9 (March 3 2008 – June 2 2008)
- Archive 10 (June 2 2008 – September 14 2008)
- Archive 11 (September 14 2008 – January 16 2009)
- Archive 12 (January 21 2009 – August 31 2009)
- Archive 13 (September 1 2009 – September 30 2009)
- Archive 14 (October 1 2009 – December 31 2009)
- Archive 15 (January 1 2010 – July 27 2010)
- Archive 16 (July 27 2010 – January 27 2011)
- Archive 17 (January 27 2011 – September 8 2011
Blocking of a user
I see you recently blocked user Jayhater because the name "advocates hatred". Might he not in real life be called "Jay Hater" and would this have made any difference in your mind? Was the matter discussed, can you let me know, or did you immediately block and inform the user? His edits look perfectly all right to me. Thincat (talk) 13:07, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
User:Scalpelpen/Philip_S._Chua
So I talked with Philip__ at #wikipeda-en-help. It turns out he's just an old grandpa type person getting used to these here intertubes. :-) With a bit of patience, he'll be looking up some reliable 3rd party quotes. Seems edge of notability, but if a paper writes about you, that's usually a good start :-). the stuff he typed so far actually does seem to imply some level notability. There's 2 or 3 3rd party sources in there. He just hasn't actually quoted from them. yet! --Kim Bruning (talk) 22:20, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
User:ALACDE2011
Can you delete User:ALACDE2011 for "the usual" or "overly promotional" please. Thank you. Puffin 18:27, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Deletion of Frisbeer?
I noticed that you deleted the Frisbeer page. This is one of the fastest growing backyard games and I believe it deserves a page. Can you please add it back or at least send me the deleted content. Much appreciated — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brianhoulihan (talk • contribs) 22:40, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
- The trouble with this article is that there is no evidence of notability. To be included in Misplaced Pages, there must be "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.". While you say it is fast-growing sport, there is no evidence of this in reliable sources. Furthermore, I'll be happy to e-mail you the deleted content if you wish. —GFOLEY FOUR!— 23:58, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
Block of 76.31.236.91
The reason these IP editors are being blocked on sight is explained at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/FaheyUSMC/Archive. Please see my links there to the forum posts where meat puppets are actively coordinating their attack on Misplaced Pages articles. It is abusive, as their intent is to insert poorly sourced contentious material in the articles The Dating Guy, Least I Could Do, and (probably soon) Ryan Sohmer. Our efforts to contain the damage has been met with derision, verbal abuse, personal attacks and attempted WP:OUTING from the various editors involved. Please reconsider your unblock. Elizium23 (talk) 04:55, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Elizium23
I have posted inline responses to each of Elizium23's points. He has obviously been arguing this SOMEWHERE as I was able to google his copy/paste boilerplate response and he has an area under his user space (http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Elizium23/The_Dating_Guy) where he seems to keep it around. It's almost completely irrelevant: he's arguing that merely including the fact that Sohmer made the allegations somehow violates NPOV or "verifiability", he deems the Kickstarter page to be verifiable enough for status of the animated series but not for whether Sohmer made the statements, he says Sohmer's own webpage/forum posts aren't "reliable" to verify whether the Kickstarter page is Sohmer's or something like that... essentially he threw a big-ass wall of text and seems to just be playing obstructionist.
I don't get it.
If he is looking for a Teletoon response to Sohmer's allegations, I was able to find one here: http://webcomicoverlook.com/2011/05/25/teletoon-responds-to-the-licd-discussion/
For NPOV reasons, it seems that should be included as a "Teletoon disputes the allegations." Assuming that this can be used as a source.76.31.236.91 (talk) 12:46, 13 September 2011 (UTC)