| Revision as of 18:11, 17 September 2011 editMabuska (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers31,831 edits →NPOV← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:12, 17 September 2011 edit undoMabuska (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers31,831 edits →NPOVNext edit → | ||
| Line 111: | Line 111: | ||
| == NPOV == | == NPOV == | ||
| Your edit summary "" i find highly ironic seeing as i'm not the one pushing an opinion. The sourced text i added is afterall sourced to the actual organisation itself and thus not opinion, and it did also take place at that same convention as i noted in my edit summary on several days before your addition of said convention. | Your edit summary "" i find highly ironic seeing as i'm not the one pushing an opinion. The sourced text i added is afterall sourced to the actual organisation itself and thus not my opinion, and it did also take place at that same convention as i noted in my edit summary on several days before your addition of said convention. | ||
| Your text is sourced yes, however there is no mix up. If you consider that a source mixup, then most of Misplaced Pages will have to be rewritten. My source is attached to the end of my addition, whereas yours to the follow up addition, and both happened at the same convention! Not very mixed up i'm afraid and makes more sense continuity wise. ] <sup>]</sup> 18:11, 17 September 2011 (UTC) | Your text is sourced yes, however there is no mix up. If you consider that a source mixup, then most of Misplaced Pages will have to be rewritten. My source is attached to the end of my addition, whereas yours to the follow up addition, and both happened at the same convention! Not very mixed up i'm afraid and makes more sense continuity wise. | ||
| On opinion, could you actually provide evidence for ''your opinions'' on their alleged republicanism on the talk page? ] <sup>]</sup> 18:11, 17 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:12, 17 September 2011
-- Trolls will be removed with Extreme prejudice!
 | If you object to anything you read on this page, then the correct solution is to click here. |
- Pádraig, Rest In Peace a chara - sorely missed - not to be forgotten.
 | This editor is a Grand Tutnum and is entitled to display this Book of Knowledge with Coffee Cup Stain. |
 | This editor is a Veteran Editor II and is entitled to display this Bronze Editor Star. |
Veteran Editor II
and is entitled to display this
Bronze Editor Star.
|
 Archives |
|---|
Useful links
Irish Manual of Style~
Policy ~
Assume good faith ~
Citing sources ~
Civility ~
Consensus ~
Dispute resolution ~
Etiquette ~
No original research ~
What Misplaced Pages is not ~
No personal attacks ~
Neutral point of view ~
POINT ~
Reliable sources ~
Verifiability ~
WP:Attribution ~
WP:Synthesis ~
tools ~
WP:Avoid peacock terms ~
Misplaced Pages:Avoid weasel terms
Domer48 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Useful Noticeboard
3RR~ WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard ~ Third opinion Noticeboard ~ Misplaced Pages:Honesty ~ Misplaced Pages:No original research/noticeboard
Template messages
Warning templates ~ Template messages/Sources of articles ~ Template messages/Cleanup ~ Template messages/Disputes
Format for reference
Cite error: The opening <ref> tag is malformed or has a bad name (see the help page).
Template for Abcom / 1rr -sanctions - add {{ }} Troubles restriction - add {{ }}
Diff
NPOV
Your edit summary "The text is sourced, and can't be mixed to suit your opinions" i find highly ironic seeing as i'm not the one pushing an opinion. The sourced text i added is afterall sourced to the actual organisation itself and thus not my opinion, and it did also take place at that same convention as i noted in my edit summary on 12th September several days before your addition of said convention.
Your text is sourced yes, however there is no mix up. If you consider that a source mixup, then most of Misplaced Pages will have to be rewritten. My source is attached to the end of my addition, whereas yours to the follow up addition, and both happened at the same convention! Not very mixed up i'm afraid and makes more sense continuity wise.
On opinion, could you actually provide evidence for your opinions on their alleged republicanism on the talk page? Mabuska 18:11, 17 September 2011 (UTC)