| Revision as of 07:06, 20 September 2011 editCptnono (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers26,588 edits →GA Reassessment← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:11, 20 September 2011 edit undoCptnono (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers26,588 edits →GA ReassessmentNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| :This is rich. You are the one edit warring, and you say the article should be delisted because of edit-warring? Ha ha. — ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 03:09, 20 September 2011 (UTC) | :This is rich. You are the one edit warring, and you say the article should be delisted because of edit-warring? Ha ha. — ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 03:09, 20 September 2011 (UTC) | ||
| ::It no longer meets GA criteria because an editor has chosen to edit war. Ban the editor and that is fixed. The end. You were offered a way to fix it (add in a revision to a line with one RS) and you chose to not do it. Delist this so we can renom it in a few weeks when this kid is banned. ] (]) 06:53, 20 September 2011 (UTC) | ::<strike>It no longer meets GA criteria because an editor has chosen to edit war. Ban the editor and that is fixed. The end. You were offered a way to fix it (add in a revision to a line with one RS) and you chose to not do it. Delist this so we can renom it in a few weeks when this kid is banned. ] (]) 06:53, 20 September 2011 (UTC) | ||
| ::And topic ban me because this cunt shows what this topic area is. I am done with these assholes. Fuck the middles east, there's too many problems.] (]) 07:01, 20 September 2011 (UTC) | ::And topic ban me because this cunt shows what this topic area is. I am done with these assholes. Fuck the middles east, there's too many problems.] (]) 07:01, 20 September 2011 (UTC) | ||
| ::Just to get one last word in, we had a GA in the topic area. This will more than likely remain at GA. Anyone who calls for its relegation is a biased jerkoff.] (]) 07:06, 20 September 2011 (UTC) | ::Just to get one last word in, we had a GA in the topic area. This will more than likely remain at GA. Anyone who calls for its relegation is a biased jerkoff.] (]) 07:06, 20 September 2011 (UTC)</strike> | ||
| ::Oh I just don't have the heart (still topic ban me if you want). This is a politically biased request from a sock who has introduced a single source to forward a line (Lebanese) that was accepted while disregarding RS saying Israel and also engaging in OR. He has gone far enough that we do not need to AGF. I am commenting on the contributor and not the content but the article has multiple sources and meets GA according to editors who are not completely biased. I am biased though so I do stand behind the middle finger I give to his political beliefs. Good thing I can go work on other GAs while he is just a schmuck. Offer an apology and this is what he does? Gaming little bitch.] (]) 07:11, 20 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:11, 20 September 2011
GA Reassessment
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
The article no longer meets GA Criteria concerning points 4 and 5 of Misplaced Pages:Good article criteria There is edit waring going on and Neutrality no longer seems to be present in particular to the subheading of the Falafal article titled North America. The specific problems have been detailed in the Talk page under the heading "Dispute over statement, "Israeli entrepreneurs brought falafel to Europe and the United States sometime in the 1970s." and citation" The current article is continually being reverted to suppress new information which reflects doubts about the credibility of statements shown in the article and neutrality. Veritycheck (talk) 00:45, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
- This is rich. You are the one edit warring, and you say the article should be delisted because of edit-warring? Ha ha. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 03:09, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
It no longer meets GA criteria because an editor has chosen to edit war. Ban the editor and that is fixed. The end. You were offered a way to fix it (add in a revision to a line with one RS) and you chose to not do it. Delist this so we can renom it in a few weeks when this kid is banned. Cptnono (talk) 06:53, 20 September 2011 (UTC)- And topic ban me because this cunt shows what this topic area is. I am done with these assholes. Fuck the middles east, there's too many problems.Cptnono (talk) 07:01, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Just to get one last word in, we had a GA in the topic area. This will more than likely remain at GA. Anyone who calls for its relegation is a biased jerkoff.Cptnono (talk) 07:06, 20 September 2011 (UTC)- Oh I just don't have the heart (still topic ban me if you want). This is a politically biased request from a sock who has introduced a single source to forward a line (Lebanese) that was accepted while disregarding RS saying Israel and also engaging in OR. He has gone far enough that we do not need to AGF. I am commenting on the contributor and not the content but the article has multiple sources and meets GA according to editors who are not completely biased. I am biased though so I do stand behind the middle finger I give to his political beliefs. Good thing I can go work on other GAs while he is just a schmuck. Offer an apology and this is what he does? Gaming little bitch.Cptnono (talk) 07:11, 20 September 2011 (UTC)