Misplaced Pages

User talk:Linuxbeak: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:55, 12 May 2011 editArcticocean (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Extended confirmed users46,227 editsm Changed protection level of User talk:Linuxbeak ( (indefinite))← Previous edit Revision as of 03:09, 21 September 2011 edit undoNyttend (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators286,364 edits Thanks for a funny read: new sectionNext edit →
Line 105: Line 105:
==RfD nomination of ]== ==RfD nomination of ]==
I have nominated {{la|Yea verily}} for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ]. Thank you. ]] 09:16, 5 March 2010 (UTC) I have nominated {{la|Yea verily}} for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ]. Thank you. ]] 09:16, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

== Thanks for a funny read ==

I see that you just edited a few days ago, so I hope you'll read this before the end of 2012. Going down a rabbit trail, I just saw your log entries for blocking ] on 18 September 2005; very funny :-) ] (]) 03:09, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:09, 21 September 2011

Welcome to Linuxbeak's Talk Page.

Please use the box below, or manually enter new messages at the end of my page so I can find them easily. Thanks!

Please click here to leave me a new message. Remember to sign your posts by adding four tildes at the end.


For earlier talk pages see the archives below:

Archive Number Message Numbers Dates What's Inside
#0 1-50 13 Mar 05 - 13 Jun 05 My welcome from Gaurav, I meet Tony the Marine and Antonio, get yelled at a little, and become an admin
#1 51-100 13 Jun 05 - 27 Jul 05 Some random discussions, people thanking me for voting support on their RFAs, MARMOT shows up and becomes a pain (and gets banned), JarlaxleArtemis complains that I blocked him, and other goodies
#2 101-150 20 Jul 05 - 7 Sep 05 More random discussions, more of JarlaxleArtemis trying to place blame on me, Tony asks for my help, JarlaxleArtemis goes insane and starts impersonating me accross different wikis (and gets banned), SPUI reveals his love for me (o_O), and Essjay appoints me as a cardinal of the Protestant Church of Misplaced Pages.
#3 151-200 7 Sep 05 - 9 Nov 05 Even more user impersonation, arbitration stuff, I go lose my cool for a moment, administrative ordeals, Daniel Brandt goes on a personal crusade against Misplaced Pages (and gets banned), and other goodies
#4 201-250 9 Nov 05 - 12 Dec 05 Pigsonthewing acts weird, I let JarlaxleArtemis and MARMOT back into the community (gasp!), random admin stuff, try to defend admins who were wrongly labeled as pedophiles, get a moving Happy Birthday from Tony the Marine, and other goodies
#5 251-300 12 Dec 05 - 26 Dec 05 More stuff on the pedophilia fiasco, become a bureaucrat, get Christmas greetings, etc
#6 301-350 26 Dec 05 - 22 Feb 06 Lots of administrative and miscellaneous discussions, Happy New Year greetings from Tony and Antonio, RFA reform discussions (which raised a bunch of questions but answered none), and I go on a break for about a month
#7 351-400 22 Feb 06 - 23 Apr 06 I come back after a month-long break, lots of miscellaneous discussions, Easter greetings from Tony, Wikimedia and Wikimania stuff
#8 401-450 23 Apr 06 - 31 May 06 Insanity: HolyRomanEmperor's request for adminship explodes, I get yelled at for unblocking a couple of users, and Half-Life 2 gains featured article status
#9 451-500 31 May 06 - 1 Sep 06 I run for the Wikimedia Board of Trustees (and lose), get featured in the New York Times, and other assorted things
#10 451-478 1 Sep 06 - 19 Jan 2007 Messages up to time that I take a 10-month Wikibreak
#11 478-550 19 Jan 07 - ? TBA


My dear friend

Send me your e-mail. I want to always keep in touch with you. Tony the Marine (talk) 03:41, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Re-evaluation of bureaucrat status

Hi there! I'm posting to inform you of an ongoing discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:Bureaucrat removal, which is of relevance to you as an en.wiki bureaucrat. The discussion centres around whether bureaucrat status should be considered a 'lifetime' appointment like administrators, or whether bureaucrats should be subject to periodic reconfirmation in a manner more like the stewards. There is also consideration for a separate re-evaluation of the status of those bureaucrats who were promoted in the early days of wikipedia, when the standards at RfB were significantly lower than they are currently, and whether such users still retain the explicit trust of the community.

As an "inactive bureaucrat" (one who has not performed a 'crat action in the past year), we're particularly keen to hear your thoughts on these issues; in particular the following:

  • Do you consider yourself to still be a wikipedia bureaucrat in spirit, or is the flag essentially just a legacy? Do you have any intention of ever returning to being an 'active' bureaucrat?
  • What do you consider your position to be in terms of your 'mandate' from the community, in comparison to more recently-promoted bureaucrats?
  • Would you be amenable to surrendering the bureaucrat flag, or participating in a reconfirmation RfB, if asked to do so? In what circumstances would you consider such an action?

Your thoughts on these, and any other comments you may have, would be very much appreciated. We have set up a section on the discussion page, Misplaced Pages talk:Bureaucrat removal#'Crat comments, for such responses.

Many thanks in advance, Happymelon 23:59, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

PS: Do you really think it's kosher to full-protect your user talk page?

Ahh, Misplaced Pages

Came across a familiar face when looking through WP:FB... reliving Wikimemories now. I haven't been in IRC in the longest time, and don't think I could handle getting back into it. How are you? — BRIAN0918 • 2009-09-02 17:37Z

Bureaucrat discussion for Juliancolton RfB

A bureaucrat discussion has been opened in order to determine the consensus in this request for adminship. Please come participate. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 01:56, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Yea verily

I have nominated Yea verily (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. œ 09:16, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for a funny read

I see that you just edited a few days ago, so I hope you'll read this before the end of 2012. Going down a rabbit trail, I just saw your log entries for blocking JarlaxleArtemis on 18 September 2005; very funny :-) Nyttend (talk) 03:09, 21 September 2011 (UTC)