Revision as of 18:51, 21 October 2011 editRet.Prof (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers15,357 edits Archive← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:43, 21 October 2011 edit undoIgnocrates (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,170 edits an observationNext edit → | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
I owe you an apology about Oculi. You were right about him! -- cheers, ] <sup>]</sup> 08:25, 17 April 2011 (UTC) | I owe you an apology about Oculi. You were right about him! -- cheers, ] <sup>]</sup> 08:25, 17 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
:Thanks. Of course the sad thing is that editors like him (and Eusebius) is that they really hurt Misplaced Pages. They alienate gifted editors. They are skilled at skirting our policies, never acting quite badly enough to be thrown out. Now the question is what to do. That is part of the reason I am stepping back. - ] (]) 09:43, 17 April 2011 (UTC) | :Thanks. Of course the sad thing is that editors like him (and Eusebius) is that they really hurt Misplaced Pages. They alienate gifted editors. They are skilled at skirting our policies, never acting quite badly enough to be thrown out. Now the question is what to do. That is part of the reason I am stepping back. - ] (]) 09:43, 17 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
I am a specialist in pattern recognition, so perhaps I can see what others cannot (or choose not to) see. I believe a particular editor intends to ] you on every article you work on until you are driven from this encyclopedia, unless you put a stop to it. ] (]) 21:43, 21 October 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:43, 21 October 2011
Talk Page Archives: |
---|
Archive 1 (2008) |
Archive 2 (2009) |
Archive 3 (2010) |
Archive 4 (2011) |
You were right about Ictu Oculi
I owe you an apology about Oculi. You were right about him! -- cheers, Michael C. Price 08:25, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. Of course the sad thing is that editors like him (and Eusebius) is that they really hurt Misplaced Pages. They alienate gifted editors. They are skilled at skirting our policies, never acting quite badly enough to be thrown out. Now the question is what to do. That is part of the reason I am stepping back. - Ret.Prof (talk) 09:43, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
I am a specialist in pattern recognition, so perhaps I can see what others cannot (or choose not to) see. I believe a particular editor intends to WP:HOUND you on every article you work on until you are driven from this encyclopedia, unless you put a stop to it. Ignocrates (talk) 21:43, 21 October 2011 (UTC)