Misplaced Pages

User talk:Selket/Archive/6: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:Selket Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:03, 15 March 2005 editTechelf (talk | contribs)2,298 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 10:01, 27 March 2006 edit undoCatapult (talk | contribs)44,687 editsm cross-namespace redirect detected, bypassing...Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
Greetings! I hope you like the place and decide to ]. If you have questions or doubts of any sort, do not hesitate to post them on the ], somebody will respond ASAP. Other helpful pages include: Greetings! I hope you like the place and decide to ]. If you have questions or doubts of any sort, do not hesitate to post them on the ], somebody will respond ASAP. Other helpful pages include:
* ] * ]
* ] * ]

Revision as of 10:01, 27 March 2006

Greetings! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you have questions or doubts of any sort, do not hesitate to post them on the Village Pump, somebody will respond ASAP. Other helpful pages include:

Have fun! --Jiang 04:39 18 Jul 2003 (UTC)


PETA

Please do not delete external links with inacruate edit comments.Geni 21:33, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)

So we link page to a page that has a link (almost certainly not delibrately) to a porn site with extreamy clear warning. I don't feel that this can be described as linking to a porn site. I also do not feel it is a reason to remove the link (wikipedia links to far far worse).Geni 22:45, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Timeline of inventions

Hi,

On Timeline of inventions, the two deleted were factually inaccurate -

  • Artificial teeth was explicitly at odds with the article on the subject, which cited an earlier case. However, that article doesn't give a source for the invention - the patent mentions "...in a more easy and effectual manner than any hitherto discovered...", wording which clearly indicates that artificial teeth were in use, and the patent was for a better form.
  • Scramjet I left out simply because of the ambiguity of when it was invented - you could probably argue for half-a-dozen dates over forty years - but I was fairly confident that one wasn't it. (In all honesty, I also meant to go back and research it, but the rest of that week grew rather busy and I forgot).

In both cases, I felt it better to have no mention than verifiably incorrect information; Scramjet as is now looks fine, but Artificial teeth still looks wrong. Shimgray 11:33, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Diuretics

Hi Selket, I agree. Perhaps an initial basic writeup would be good just to get things going, and perhaps people can fill it in with more detail afterwards. I'm a bit too busy to do it myself at the moment unfortunately. -Techelf 12:03, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)