Revision as of 09:31, 27 March 2006 editAzaToth (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators23,224 editsm My RfA← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:04, 27 March 2006 edit undoEdwy (talk | contribs)9,176 edits HiNext edit → | ||
Line 175: | Line 175: | ||
09:31, 27 March 2006 (UTC) | 09:31, 27 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
|} | |} | ||
== Hi == | |||
Hi, you are being discussed at ] - I didn't know if you knew. --] 15:04, 27 March 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:04, 27 March 2006
Operation Clambake
Hi, I saw your edits to Operation Clambake. Have you considered yet joining Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Scientology? The questions of how the various Scientology-related categories are arranged are the sort of thing that gets debated there. -- Antaeus Feldspar 23:06, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
- Im a relatively new wiki user, but if you feel I may be of value to the project, I'd love to participate. Any information I should have before adding my name to the participants secion of WP:SCN? AKMask 06:44, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
- Nothing besides the basic policies you need to know on Misplaced Pages anyways. It's actually surprising how few problem users WP:SCN collects; mostly everyone there seems truly interesting in getting the articles up to an NPOV standard. -- Antaeus Feldspar 23:00, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
Epitaph/RIAA connection, etc
replying to: Im just posting this because I wish to avoid any sort of edit war. Is it possible for you to cite a notable source defining a major record label the way you are asserting? It's a new one by me. AKMask 16:38, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
Hi, I appreciate your efforts to avoid an edit war (I don't want one either).
Regarding the RIAA/indie label issue, it's difficult to find authoritative sources for the absolute definition of "independent" as it is mainly a matter of rough consensus of the indie community. However, increasingly RIAA membership has served as sort of the litmus test for a label's independence (I'm sure you're familiar with the RIAA Radar).
In that sense, here are some links attempting to document the consensus regarding RIAA membership:
Indie Labels join RIAA
Indie Labels Upset About Incorrect RIAA Link
Indie labels: "RIAA is NOT the whole music industry"
17+ indie labels go to RIAA
I'm willing to concede that some (perhaps many) don't agree with the anti-RIAA definition of indie, and that fact should be included in both the Epitaph and the independent record label articles. --Bk0 (Talk) 16:58, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
FL quest
Thank you for the FL quest on List of Oh My Goddess episodes --Cool Cat 12:22, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
- No problem. It's a very detailed list. You guys worked hard, I want to see it make it. -AKMask 12:30, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
Cisco
Hi, I'm new to wikipedia, so don't mind me if I'm doing things completely wrong. Anyhow, I edited the article 'cisco (wine)' recently, but you changed it back. I just wanted to let you know that the only ones I've ever seen sold around here are 18%, and also, "berry", "orange", and "Red" are all flavors I have seen first hand. There are even more flavors that I've seen also, but I didn't want to speculate... I only wrote the ones I was sure about. I thought maybe raspberry was the same as berry. So anyway, I just wanted to let you know that I believe you if you say that there is a 19.5 and 17.5 version of cisco, which I'd really like to see, but the info I added, specifically the flavors, should have been kept on the page. There is a liquor store about 30 minutes out of my town which specializes in bum wines which I'll be driving past in the next week. So I'll stop in and check up on the flavors for sure this time.
- I actually hadnt noticed you added flaors into it. By all means add your 18% figure, but keep the 19% one as well. I have bottles and bottles of Cisco Peach 19%. -AKMask 14:12, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
The Black List
As you are aware, we are all listed on the black list. Do you think that everyone who is listed on that list should be informed (in case they don't know) so that they can avoid giving out personal information? In fact, I find it most disturbing that he has taken my quotes out of context - elsewhere in the same comments, I am praising him for finding out who wrote that stuff about Seigenthaler. BTW what's he got against Gmail? I have one of their accounts. Izehar (talk) 18:06, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
- I'm not planning on revealing any info - I like being mysterious John Doe#16. Anyway, I daren't e-mail him. My e-mail address is subject to a fundamental defect - see here. Izehar (talk) 20:01, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
7 Up
I'll look at it again after shabath. Thanks for bringing your complaint to my attention. Cheers, Tomer 23:07, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
RE: Titoxd's RfB
Hello. I wondered if you could clarify something for me. You said that Bureaucratship is nt the next logical step from Adminship. Why isn't it and what is the next step? If a user has been an Admin for a goodly long while and an editor for that same goodly long while surely they can be trusted with the powers, hereby openning up a new chapter in their WikiLives? I don't understand - do they not deserve that right through their long service to the project? --Celestianpower 10:09, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
RfC against Young Zaphod
An RfC has been filed against Young Zaphod. See (and endorse) Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Young Zaphod. --Karnesky 12:30, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
First Family of the United States
Hey, someone redirected the entire First Family of the United States article into First Family. I just wanted to let you know, seeing as more people voted to keep it than to redirect. I'm reposting it. History21 16:50, 20 February 2006 (UTC)History21
Argox
Thank you for your comments on Argox's AfD page. Ruby has been wikistalking me, and it's very annoying. For instance, DAP Technologies and Virtutech. I don't exactly know how to deal with this problem. Jehochman 18:45, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
AfD for Acellus
I know you're just being humourous, but your vote isn't really clear and may be mistaken for a keep vote. There is a cople of sockpuppets already and your vote could actually turn into lack of consensus - which defaults to keep. Please consider revising your vote. Ifnord 18:59, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
AfD for Jeremy
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jeremy_Rosenfeld_2 --Candide, or Optimism 22:41, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Deletion of Out the road article.
===>Thanks Sometimes I get too ahead of myself on "new page patrol" and you were right. -Justin (koavf), talk 22:11, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/We Belong Together
The awards ceremony image has been removed and I'd appreciate it if you reanalyzed your vote. However, the chart graph remains. —Eternal Equinox | talk 15:15, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Welcome
Welcome to the Tropical Cyclone Wikiproject! I see you are just getting started in helping with tropical cyclone articles, and us at the project are happy you joined. There are numerous ongoing projects, including greatly improving the retired hurricane/typhoon articles or finishing a database encompassing tropical cyclone seasons in every basin. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me or at our headquarters. Have fun, and see you around.
Re: Messier
Well, Messier played junior 'A' in my hometown for my favourite team, he was a great two-way forward, he was a terrific leader, he could score with the best of them and I'm surprised he never won a Selke trophy (they've always had a thing against giving it to top scorers)...I have to support him! Lord Bob 01:37, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
- St. Albert, Alberta. Messier played with the Spruce Grove Mets and the St. Albert Saints when they moved during his junior 'A' career. Lord Bob 01:42, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways, from comparing articles that need work to other articles you've edited, to choosing articles randomly (ensuring that all articles with cleanup tags get a chance to be cleaned up). It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Misplaced Pages better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 13:59, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for your support.. This guy resurfaces on this and other articles ever so often, check his contribs... Actually he's already gone way past 3 reverts today, but it was good of you to warn him... ፈቃደ (ውይይት) 18:25, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
Huerta
Could you explain me why the article Huerta should redirect to Murcia instead of provide a propper definition? --Edmont 16:02, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Regarding your vote
Hey, we have made a lot of improvements on the Hinduism article that you voted for removal in FARC.1 I would urge you to take a look at it again and hopefully change your vote or offer suggestions for further improvement. Thanks for your help. (Blacksun 00:14, 23 March 2006 (UTC))
Classic Rock
I've updated my Classic Rock List with your songs. You might find that some of your votes aren't present. If that is so it is because I felt that those songs weren't truly classic rock. If you have any comments feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. RENTA 02:25, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Various unseen or stub Star Trek Classes
Mass afding is bad practice. I am quite displeased. --Cool Cat 20:20, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
- (crossposted on my talk page and yours for ease of following)
- Perhaps you may wish to look at WP:AfD#How_to_list_multiple_related_pages_for_deletion where it's explained as part of AfD procedure before you say it is a bad practice. -M 20:22, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, the fact is it hasnt even been one week since I recreated those articles. You went ahead for mass deletion without even discussing it. Frankly I find that rude. --Cool Cat 22:45, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
- There was a previous AfD that mandated returning many of the ship class articles back into the list. You should have checked the history before recreating.Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Hokule'a class starship covers that class plus a number of others. Frankly, disregarding previous AfD's is what I find rude.-M 22:51, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
- Interesting point. I will remeber this incident and I can assure you the memories are not pleasant. I see this as a continunation of the censor of fiction and pop culture on wikipedia. --Cool Cat 02:37, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
- There was a previous AfD that mandated returning many of the ship class articles back into the list. You should have checked the history before recreating.Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Hokule'a class starship covers that class plus a number of others. Frankly, disregarding previous AfD's is what I find rude.-M 22:51, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, the fact is it hasnt even been one week since I recreated those articles. You went ahead for mass deletion without even discussing it. Frankly I find that rude. --Cool Cat 22:45, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
Makemi RfA
Thank you for voting on my RfA. It passed with a consensus to promote of 45/7/1. To those of you concerned about the fact that I am a relative newcomer, I encourage you to poke me with a sharp stick if I make a mistake. Or better yet, let me know on my talk page, and I'll do my best to fix it. Makemi 05:21, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
List of Starfleet ship classes
I have no problem with a short summary. However the page is already very long, so I'd prefer them to be short. AlistairMcMillan 01:40, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
- I've edited the two classes where you added summaries. Is something like that okay with you? AlistairMcMillan 02:06, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
My RfA
My RfA | ||
Thank you for supporting/opposing/commenting on my request of adminship, sadly the result was 54/20/7 an thus only 73% support votes, resulting in that the nomination failed. As many of you commenting that I have to few main-space edits, I'll try to better my self on that part. If you have any ideas on what kind of articles I could edit, pleas send me a line. :) | →AzaToth
09:31, 27 March 2006 (UTC) |
Hi
Hi, you are being discussed at WP:ANI#Stalking by user:AKMask - I didn't know if you knew. --Latinus 15:04, 27 March 2006 (UTC)