Misplaced Pages

User talk:Calliopejen1: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:56, 27 October 2011 editCalliopejen1 (talk | contribs)Administrators132,969 edits →Hmm....← Previous edit Revision as of 16:12, 27 October 2011 edit undoJimbo Wales (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Founder14,538 edits →Hmm....Next edit →
Line 140: Line 140:
you introduced a ton of material that appears to be directly copied from . As you say you are a Harvard law graduate and the editors of the book are associated with Harvard Law, I am thinking that perhaps this is not a straightforward case of plagiarism / copyright violation, but that perhaps you have permission? (I know John Palfrey, and of coursee he's a friend of Misplaced Pages, so that wouldn't shock me.) If not, I'm afraid we need to delete this.--] (]) 15:49, 27 October 2011 (UTC) you introduced a ton of material that appears to be directly copied from . As you say you are a Harvard law graduate and the editors of the book are associated with Harvard Law, I am thinking that perhaps this is not a straightforward case of plagiarism / copyright violation, but that perhaps you have permission? (I know John Palfrey, and of coursee he's a friend of Misplaced Pages, so that wouldn't shock me.) If not, I'm afraid we need to delete this.--] (]) 15:49, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
:That content is Creative Commons-licensed, as you can see in the note giving credit at the bottom of the article and at the (see footer). It looks like they must have republished the content in a book, but that doesn't change the fact that they granted a Creative Commons license... I'm not really sure why they didn't CC license the book also, considering that the content (or some version of some part of it) is already free, but I suppose it doesn't hurt to make money off of your content in one venue, even if you've released it freely in another. ] (]) 15:56, 27 October 2011 (UTC) :That content is Creative Commons-licensed, as you can see in the note giving credit at the bottom of the article and at the (see footer). It looks like they must have republished the content in a book, but that doesn't change the fact that they granted a Creative Commons license... I'm not really sure why they didn't CC license the book also, considering that the content (or some version of some part of it) is already free, but I suppose it doesn't hurt to make money off of your content in one venue, even if you've released it freely in another. ] (]) 15:56, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
::Great, super. Sorry to have bothered you. Thanks!--] (]) 16:12, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:12, 27 October 2011

Centralized discussion


Archives

Archive 1 (from when I was Calliopejen)
Archive 2 (Apr - May 2007)
Archive 3 (June - July 2007)
Archive 4 (July - Oct 2007)
Archive 5 (Oct 2007 - Feb 2008)
Archive 6 (Feb 2008 - Apr 2009)
Archive 7 (Apr 2009-Jan 2010)
Archive 8 (Jan 2010-present)


This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Nomination of List of villages in Hinthada District for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of villages in Hinthada District is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of villages in Hinthada District until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Rossheth | Talk to me 17:29, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi, can you place your lists in Category:Lists of villages by township of the Ayeyarwady Region? Cheers. Some things, can you greatly reduce the size of the notes section, and widen the coordinate and other columns? Just unlikely they will be filled in the near future. Also I think it might be better if you wikilink the villages to start off with and put them in alpha order by default if this is possible? This way they can be dabbed in the future.. By the end of this I would also like a List of village tracts of Burma..♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:59, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Purrfect, if you could also format the ones you started in the same way this would be great. Yeah Template:Hsi Hseng Township is at TFD too. Not complaining as its ignited my interest in Burma again and doesn't stand a chance of being deleted..♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:50, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

If you could list all your lists under List of populated places in Burma this would be great.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:01, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Only thing is that a lot of the transliterationns differ from those on google and geonames. Like Da Yei Pauk =Dayebauk. The positive thing though is that the settlement do all exist of course! But it will require quite a lot of concentration to match em up. View Dayebauk here on google earth. Looks great.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:12, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Grrr wikipedia is full of irritating people today. Can you AFD List of cities, towns and villages in Burma: A, List of cities, towns and villages in Burma: B and List of cities, towns and villages in Burma: Y and Template:Lists of Burma locations. These lists are now alienated anyway as List of cities, towns and villages has been redirected to list of populated places and your lists. But my db-author tags were removed senselessly.. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:05, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Have you given up on the lists?♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:10, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

I think I'm yet to see you ever complete a task Jen! You gave up on the Chile dictionary too!♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:50, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

CCI update

CCI complete Misplaced Pages:Contributor copyright investigations/FlyingToaster is now complete. Thank you for your assistance in the evaluation of this CCI.

Thank you very much. :D--Moonriddengirl 14:35, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 October 2011


Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:07, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
I'm quite impressed with your diligent work identifying images, preventing unnecessary deletions. Thank you so much! You have earned this barn star. – Quadell 11:57, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Kind request of improuvement and translation for Ludmilla Radchenko Thanks in advance from the heart

Good morning to you,


I write you first to greet you and to wish you a good day, it thrives, generous and full of successes. In addition to this, you point out this article about a Russian model living in Italy, but which is also active in the United States and Anglophone countries. It's called Ludmilla Radchenko, and I got to know during his fashion show in my native land. Is a very sweet girl, sweet and friendly, typical of Russian. I'm asking you because I saw that you are a member of the fashion project, and who better than you can bring back on track, I trust you fully. cure them in detail. said thank you in advance that my whole heart, and if you need it for the Italian or the Sicilian, I am at your disposal. Thanks for everything, and good start to the day. cordially. Luigi--Lodewijk Vadacchino (talk) 06:03, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Kootical pic

Hi - I have no objection to Kootical.jpg being deleted. It is a poor graphic and I have no recollection of uploading it. I must have been less than attentive - thanks for bringing it to my attention. Mark 23:16, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Expand other language

Template:Expand other language has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 06:45, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 October 2011


Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 10:01, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Moving Burma to Myanmar - ongoing poll

This is to let you know that an ongoing poll is taking place to move Burma to Myanmar. This note is going out to wikipedia members who have participated in Burma/Myanmar name changing polls in the past. It does not include banned members nor those with only ip addresses. Thank you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:35, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

User:Fastily/FfD

Hi Calliopejen1. As you probably know, when nominating files for deletion at WP:FFD using twinkle, it occasionally fails to list the file. Because of this bug, I have set up a program to generate a list of files nominated for deletion without an associated nomination. A few of the files you nominated for deletion came up in the report, so I thought you might be interested in this list. Regards, FASTILY 21:33, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

File:MBD mordechai ben david mbd (47).JPG

Hi there. You tagged File:MBD mordechai ben david mbd (47).JPG for deletion at PUF, but it seems you forgot to actually list the file. Just thought I'd point this out to you. Regards. — ξ 22:07, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Careful there

Almost everything you've listed in Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion/2011 October 24 was already listed on the 20th. Mangoe (talk) 02:20, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

The listings seemed to have gotten deleted in a mistaken edit, but I didn't want to restore them in case some had been renominated elsewhere. So I was just renominating them individually. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:22, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Survey for new page patrollers

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Calliopejen1! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 12:04, 25 October 2011 (UTC).


Images "X ... parenthesis... .svg"

Hi - I have no objection to either of these images being deleted. I had trouble making changes and so I uploaded what I needed under other names. Congratulations for your services to Misplaced Pages. RMPK (talk) 04:38, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 October 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 10:16, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Yagura castle.png deletion

Thanks for notifying me about this file. I updated its 'talk' page, but yes please go ahead and rmove the file. It is redundant. --Ph0kin (talk) 03:41, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

That was a very good addition you made to the essay about image arguments to avoid. Thanks! By the way, I think you do excellent work in that area. --Tryptofish (talk) 13:41, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Hmm....

In this edit you introduced a ton of material that appears to be directly copied from this book. As you say you are a Harvard law graduate and the editors of the book are associated with Harvard Law, I am thinking that perhaps this is not a straightforward case of plagiarism / copyright violation, but that perhaps you have permission? (I know John Palfrey, and of coursee he's a friend of Misplaced Pages, so that wouldn't shock me.) If not, I'm afraid we need to delete this.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 15:49, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

That content is Creative Commons-licensed, as you can see in the note giving credit at the bottom of the article and at the source link (see footer). It looks like they must have republished the content in a book, but that doesn't change the fact that they granted a Creative Commons license... I'm not really sure why they didn't CC license the book also, considering that the content (or some version of some part of it) is already free, but I suppose it doesn't hurt to make money off of your content in one venue, even if you've released it freely in another. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:56, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Great, super. Sorry to have bothered you. Thanks!--Jimbo Wales (talk) 16:12, 27 October 2011 (UTC)