Misplaced Pages

User talk:Russavia: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:37, 27 October 2011 view sourceRussavia (talk | contribs)78,741 edits →opinion on Lizzie Phelan: rsp← Previous edit Revision as of 16:15, 27 October 2011 view source Russavia (talk | contribs)78,741 edits →Unblock: new sectionNext edit →
Line 75: Line 75:
Hi buddy. Would you be so kind as to give your opinion on the ] entry as a member of the Russian Mass Media task force? Cheers ] (]) 15:27, 27 October 2011 (UTC) Hi buddy. Would you be so kind as to give your opinion on the ] entry as a member of the Russian Mass Media task force? Cheers ] (]) 15:27, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
:Hi GPF, thanks for the message. At the moment I am having to deal with some pretty serious harrassment at ] so right now I can't look at it in any great depth. However, I did have a quick glance at it, and it does look like a "borderline" case somewhat. Try to find as many independent sources as you can. But at the moment, it looks like it is headed for a no consensus decision. If I get a chance in the next day or so, and the AfD is still active, I will see what I can dig up on it for you. Sorry I couldn't be of more immediate assistance to you, given the circumstances I hope you understand. Cheers, ] <sup>]</sup> 15:37, 27 October 2011 (UTC) :Hi GPF, thanks for the message. At the moment I am having to deal with some pretty serious harrassment at ] so right now I can't look at it in any great depth. However, I did have a quick glance at it, and it does look like a "borderline" case somewhat. Try to find as many independent sources as you can. But at the moment, it looks like it is headed for a no consensus decision. If I get a chance in the next day or so, and the AfD is still active, I will see what I can dig up on it for you. Sorry I couldn't be of more immediate assistance to you, given the circumstances I hope you understand. Cheers, ] <sup>]</sup> 15:37, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

== Unblock ==

{{unblock|I feel that the block at this stage is not conducive to issues of harrassment being dealt with at the still open AE request. When issues of harrassment have been raised, and there is clear evidence, it isn't quite right that one should be blocked whilst that process is underway.}}

Revision as of 16:15, 27 October 2011

User:Russavia/Top

Can you help?!?

I am in constant need of photos for various articles I am working on, and I am in dire need of the following photos from around the globe. So I turn to the community in the hope that someone out there is able to take the photos that I require.

If you can help with photos of any of these subjects, please upload them to Commons, and then post a short message with a link to the photos on my English Misplaced Pages talk page.

In the event you don't have a Commons log-in, you can email them to me at russavia.wikipedia@gmail.com and advise which licence you would like to licence them under, and I can do the uploading, categorisation, etc.

I have provided as much detail on what I require, including addresses, links to online maps, and photos of the subject that I am unable to upload to Commons, in order for photographers to identify the subject I require.

More info at User:Russavia/Required photos


Welcome to my talk page. Please leave me a message, alternatively you are welcome to email me. If you leave a message here for me and it requires a reply, I will reply here, so you may want to add my talk page to your watchlist. All users have my permission to remove any bot messages from my talk page at any time.
The Signpost
24 December 2024


Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30


This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Notes

Please do not edit other people's statements..

Like you just did at RfArb/A: It's impolite, combative, and in the long run of things, fairly useless to the Arbitrators. See this discussion thread on more Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests#Statement_by_uninvolved.... Thanks. SirFozzie (talk) 19:34, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Refer to User_talk:Russavia#Collect right above here. It is dishonest of an editor to claim to be uninvolved, particular in a thread which is discussing topic bans on two editors in which Collect was more than a willing participant in edit warring, plastering notices on people's talk pages warning them of 3RR, when he was edit warring, and ignoring talk page discussions. It is now becoming a running joke. It may not be of any use to Arbitrators, but it of use to the general community who might be otherwise clueless as to an editor's level of involvement. But hey, if you say it is combative, I won't do it in future. I have removed all pages, except for those in my userspace from my watchlist, am no longer keeping any major tabs on discussions, with the exception of the clarification request, so I thank you for the link; I will post a comment over there. Cheers, Russavia 19:43, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Avicopter AC313

Nice find! Since we do have an article for the Avicopter AC313, I'ved moved the photo there from the Aérospatiale Super Frelon/Z-8 page. - BilCat (talk) 10:08, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for that BilCat, sorry just saw your message now. Got a heap of new permissions as well, with a lot of rare pics becoming available to us. Russavia 19:10, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi

I left you a message . No need to discuss anything. This is simply my suggestion. Biophys (talk) 00:42, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Please STOP stalking my edits!! You have NEVER edited the article before, nor have you ever commented on the talk page. Taken in with the recent similar case, it is bloody obvious you are stalking my edits. And when you add the Aeroflot article into the fray, it is fricking obvious that you are still treating WP as a battleground. Isn't it fantastic that here I am, banned from interacting with you, yet you, given your previous (and still current) harrassment on myself, are not hit with a likewise ban. Stop using interaction bans as a weapon to control content, and to lock people who you consider an opponent out of an article. Otherwise you will find yourself getting raked over the coals. Russavia 01:01, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
P.S. As well as this being a request for you to stop stalking my edits, this is also a request to leave me alone. That means stay off my talk page! Russavia 01:04, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Fine, I have no problem with not coming to your talk page. I thought it would be in your best interests to comply with your editing restrictions, and therefore left this message at your talk page (you was active but did not respond at article talk page for a few hours). Yes, I occasionally talked with Vecrumba and TLAM and watched what they do. They did not mind. Biophys (talk) 01:29, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Will someone get it thru this editors thick skull that stalking and harrassment is not on. And also tell them to stay away from me Otherwise I will explode. Russavia 01:38, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

AE report

I submitted it here. Thanks, Biophys (talk) 16:54, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Of course you did. LOL. I'll respond in kind to you. Fool. Russavia 18:09, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

I'm a lazy boy

G'day and yeah, I suppose I really should get myself a Commons identity as well. Cheers YSSYguy (talk) 22:51, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Righto, thanks for the links. YSSYguy (talk) 23:16, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

opinion on Lizzie Phelan

Hi buddy. Would you be so kind as to give your opinion on the Lizzie Phelan entry as a member of the Russian Mass Media task force? Cheers GrandPhilliesFan (talk) 15:27, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi GPF, thanks for the message. At the moment I am having to deal with some pretty serious harrassment at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Russavia so right now I can't look at it in any great depth. However, I did have a quick glance at it, and it does look like a "borderline" case somewhat. Try to find as many independent sources as you can. But at the moment, it looks like it is headed for a no consensus decision. If I get a chance in the next day or so, and the AfD is still active, I will see what I can dig up on it for you. Sorry I couldn't be of more immediate assistance to you, given the circumstances I hope you understand. Cheers, Russavia 15:37, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Unblock

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Russavia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I feel that the block at this stage is not conducive to issues of harrassment being dealt with at the still open AE request. When issues of harrassment have been raised, and there is clear evidence, it isn't quite right that one should be blocked whilst that process is underway.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I feel that the block at this stage is not conducive to issues of harrassment being dealt with at the still open AE request. When issues of harrassment have been raised, and there is clear evidence, it isn't quite right that one should be blocked whilst that process is underway. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I feel that the block at this stage is not conducive to issues of harrassment being dealt with at the still open AE request. When issues of harrassment have been raised, and there is clear evidence, it isn't quite right that one should be blocked whilst that process is underway. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I feel that the block at this stage is not conducive to issues of harrassment being dealt with at the still open AE request. When issues of harrassment have been raised, and there is clear evidence, it isn't quite right that one should be blocked whilst that process is underway. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Category: