| Revision as of 17:14, 26 October 2011 editWizardman (talk | contribs)Administrators399,742 edits Undid revision 457515652 by G90025 (talk) lol. you're the one edit-warring on multiple pages← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:14, 27 October 2011 edit undoMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 4 thread(s) (older than 6d) to User talk:Wizardman/Archive39.Next edit → | ||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
| |frequency = once a month | |frequency = once a month | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == Delegate request == | |||
| ] has asked if he can assist in closing FTC/GTCs. Can you weight in on the ] on if he can be a delegate? ] 22:43, 18 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Instead of a delete, consider my and Spanneraol idea so this won't end up as a no consensus for no apparent reason ] <sup>]</sup> 23:17, 20 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Source query == | |||
| I really feel like this source could go either way, depending on how the review goes. I've seen it be accepted at FAC before, but standards have tightened a little since then. If the author is well-regarded, that's a point in the source's favor. Be ready to prove it if the page is questioned, as that is the best advice I can give you. You also may want to source some facts cited by that link to other things if possible, so it doesn't look like the article is overly reliant on that source. It's easier to get a positive response if something is sourcing a few (preferably non-controversial) facts, as opposed to 10 or 20. ''']''' (]) 02:57, 21 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Interview for the 2011 Misplaced Pages Fundraiser == | |||
| Hello Wizardman, | |||
| I hope you're well. My name is Aaron and I'm one of the Storytellers working on the 2011 fundraiser here at the Wikimedia Foundation. For this year's campaign we're seeking out and interviewing active Wikipedians like yourself, in order to produce a broader and more representative range of "personal appeals" to run come November. If you'd like to participate in this project, please email me at amuszalskiwikimedia.org. Interviews are typically conducted by phone or Skype and take between 30-90 minutes. (Note: This invitation is open to any interested Wikipedian — If you're reading this, and would like to be interviewed as well, please contact me.) Thanks! ] (]) 19:29, 21 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Larger GT/FTs subsuming smaller ones == | == Larger GT/FTs subsuming smaller ones == | ||
Revision as of 20:14, 27 October 2011
|
Larger GT/FTs subsuming smaller onesI thought that when a large-scale FT/GT was submitted that it subsumed smaller ones, like my Battlecruisers of the Royal Navy GT absorbed the individual class GTs. But the Armored cruisers of Germany GT didn't absorb the individual class GTs. I bring this up because the Battlecruisers of Japan GT that I just nominated should absorb the existing Kongo-class battlecruiser GT. And we wouldn't want to be inconsistent...--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:46, 22 October 2011 (UTC) Scjessey is disruptiveI see that User:II mentions on ANI that Scjessey has been judged by the suitable committee, yourself included. I also see that Scjessey is still acting disruptively against other users. User II notes this, not me. Therefore, I propose that Scjessey just be banned from the articles. As for me, I am just making a few suggestions on the Obama and Perry articles, asking people to re-examine what is important. Trivial details, such as a trivial law passed, is not a significant part of a biography and shouldn't be there. I ahve no political agenda, either for or against the men. BAMP (talk) 18:21, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Brimstone (wrestler)When will this page be unprotected? It has been protected for SIX MONTHS.Theclarkie (talk) 21:01, 24 October 2011 (UTC) The Signpost: 24 October 2011
New Page Patrol survey
|
