Revision as of 00:07, 28 March 2006 editDarlaCrane (talk | contribs)93 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Revision as of 02:07, 28 March 2006 edit undoJtkiefer (talk | contribs)9,299 edits blankingNext edit → |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{divbox|red| |<center><b>I Confirm that I am ] on meta</b></center>}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{User:Jtkiefer/userpage/talk}} |
|
|
<!-- page ] is used to set stress]] --> |
|
|
<!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE --> |
|
|
<!-- NEW THREADS AT BOTTOM OF PAGE --> |
|
|
|
|
|
== Incident Report Board == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, I` m soory, but I had nothing to do with this; this is the first I even hear of it.] 03:26, 17 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Acuman Is Very Underhanded== |
|
|
|
|
|
He instigates these problems then pretends he is innocent. I was never warned by anyone I was told that the beleived I made a personal attack and I verified what I did. Can you please look at the threat Acuman made toward me. How come nothing is done about his racist or untrue comments? Look at the large group of people complaining about his edits that are very misleading and misinforming ] 05:06, 17 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== 250 == |
|
|
|
|
|
He's supposed to be blocked per . As you can see for yourself, he's now moved to grossly vandalizing my talk page! ]<sup>]</sup> 06:29, 17 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== RE == |
|
|
|
|
|
Could i ask my what's my personal attack? ] 23:26, 17 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Since you're opposed to Curps's block bot== |
|
|
You might be interested in . --] (] - <small>]</small>) 01:45, 18 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==]== |
|
|
''original header ==]== --- changed so it wouldn't break talk page formatting'' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A final decision has been made in the above arbitration case, and it has been closed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Arbitration committee. ---] 16:55, 20 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Loyola vandal == |
|
|
|
|
|
You might want to read ] for more information about this vandal. In general, he is to be indef blocked on sight. Many of the reports in ] contain useful information about vandals and are recommended reading. Cheers! --] ] 02:03, 22 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Curpsbot== |
|
|
I didn't expect to be unbanned yet, so I emailed you. Would you be willing to certify an RFC "against" Curps relating to his block bot? Alternately, do you think there's any chance of an RFC about block bots in general not being deleted after a day for not being certified? --] (] - <small>]</small>) 08:53, 23 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Jtkiefer. I notice you seem to be active on the Bots request for approval page, so I was wondering if you could take a look at ] and leave a comment on it. Thanks! ] 23:22, 23 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==]== |
|
|
I modified the template. It now works on all archive pages on wikipedia. It will also work as if I never made an edit as it is backwards compatible. --<small>]<sup>]|]</sup></small> 00:56, 25 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Warning Template Subst == |
|
|
|
|
|
*Hey, I noticed that your bot has been substituting a bunch of my vanadlism warnings given to anon users. I was just wondering why you were doing this? I read the policy page but didn't quite understand why it's necessary. Thanks -- ] 21:28, 25 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==WikiProject Star Wars== |
|
|
|
|
|
Hey there. I noticed you created an incarnation of WPSW a couple months ago. Well, ] has been up for a month and a half now, so feel free to join and help out! — ''']]]''' 22:10, 25 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== re: personal attacks == |
|
|
|
|
|
I phrased my opinion in the most civil manner I saw possible, and also linked to a couple of the edits that led me to that opinion. Had I said "oppose, candidate is a lunatic" (or "batshit"), I agree that it would have constituted a personal attack. — <small>Mar. 26, '06</small> <tt class=plainlinks>''' <]>'''</tt> |
|
|
|
|
|
== Dropping adminship == |
|
|
|
|
|
I do hope you are serious in your statement on the failed bcrat nomination page that you will also be resigning your adminship. Without animosity, I feel that would be best all around. For one thing, I can show it to JDG and hopefully use it to get him back to the project. For another thing, your history as Jtkiefer will follow you around like a wolf even if you have learned from all these misadventures. Better to chill out and come back later, compile a good record as a contributor, then see where you want to take it... Where will I be able to see you are in fact off the rolls of active admins? ] 21:59, 26 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== removal of access == |
|
|
|
|
|
I've fulfilled your request on Meta. Sorry to see you go. Regards — ] | ] 22:53, 27 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Hello Jtkiefer, |
|
|
|
|
|
I'm very sorry if I have overstepped my bounds...I assure you that is not my intention! |
|
|
|
|
|
Jewell Marceau told me (two days ago) that she was terribly unhappy with the way she had been described on Misplaced Pages. She knew that I am somewhat..okay *a very little bit* familiar with this website and asked me if I could help her make some changes in the page. The image used was supplied by her, with her full permission. It is also used on her page of the "My Space" website. |
|
|
|
|
|
A huge problem that so many performers in the adult industry face is that people take extreme liberties with our personal information and feel absolutely vallidated in posting hurtful, and even dangerous tidbits on the Internet. I myself have had extreme difficulties with cyberstalking. This is probably why my "POV" seems too slanted in favor of the individual. |
|
|
|
|
|
I have attempted to "Wikify" the page and remove traces of my personal "POV." I'm hoping I have met your approval? Please feel free to instruct me further... |
|
|
|
|
|
Sincerely, |
|
|
Darla Crane |
|