| Revision as of 22:45, 17 November 2002 edit65.92.30.160 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:07, 17 November 2002 edit undoV~enwiki (talk | contribs)133 editsm rvNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| '''Agnosticism''' in its original |
'''Agnosticism''' in its original sense (i.e., as coined by ]), refers to the following principles: "In matters of the intellect, follow your reason as far as it will take you, without regard to any other consideration. And negatively: In matters of the intellect, do not pretend that conclusions are certain which are not demonstrated or demonstrable" (Huxley, <i>Agnosticism</i>, 1889). The term may also be applied to the belief that there is evenly-weighted evidence on both sides of the question of ]'s existence, the belief that we are in no position to judge the evidence on either side, the belief that we <i>cannot</i> judge the evidence, the belief that we cannot <i>know</i> one way or the other, the condition of lacking a belief in ] and ] both, and various other 'non-committal' approaches to the question of God's existence. | ||
| The word comes from the Greek ''a'' (no) and ''gnosis'' (knowledge). Among the most famous agnostics (in the original sense) were ], ], and ]. Russell's ''Why I Am Not a Christian'' is a classic text of agnosticism. It has been argued from his works, especially <i>Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion</i>, that ] was an agnostic, this however remains subject to debate. | The word comes from the Greek ''a'' (no) and ''gnosis'' (knowledge). Among the most famous agnostics (in the original sense) were ], ], and ]. Russell's ''Why I Am Not a Christian'' is a classic text of agnosticism. It has been argued from his works, especially <i>Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion</i>, that ] was an agnostic, this however remains subject to debate. | ||
Revision as of 23:07, 17 November 2002
Agnosticism in its original sense (i.e., as coined by Thomas Henry Huxley), refers to the following principles: "In matters of the intellect, follow your reason as far as it will take you, without regard to any other consideration. And negatively: In matters of the intellect, do not pretend that conclusions are certain which are not demonstrated or demonstrable" (Huxley, Agnosticism, 1889). The term may also be applied to the belief that there is evenly-weighted evidence on both sides of the question of God's existence, the belief that we are in no position to judge the evidence on either side, the belief that we cannot judge the evidence, the belief that we cannot know one way or the other, the condition of lacking a belief in theism and atheism both, and various other 'non-committal' approaches to the question of God's existence.
The word comes from the Greek a (no) and gnosis (knowledge). Among the most famous agnostics (in the original sense) were Huxley, Charles Darwin, and Bertrand Russell. Russell's Why I Am Not a Christian is a classic text of agnosticism. It has been argued from his works, especially Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, that David Hume was an agnostic, this however remains subject to debate.
As noted above, the term may be applied to the simple failure to hold that God does or does not exist (i.e., not taking a stand). In this sense, the twentieth century logical positivists, such as Rudolph Carnap and A. J. Ayer--who believed that talk of God and perforce considerations of whether one can know that God exists are simply nonsense--would count as agnostics. The freethinking tradition of atheism calls "agnosticism," used in this sense, negative atheism.
See also atheism, God, religion, religiosity, secularism, rationalism, listing of noted agnostics, deism, theism.