| Revision as of 22:23, 14 November 2011 editThe Banner (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers125,106 edits →Crawley Council election, 2012← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:37, 15 November 2011 edit undoLucy-marie (talk | contribs)10,326 edits →Crawley Council election, 2012Next edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| *'''Oppose''' - The elections will take place and the date is already known as it is set out in statute and the wards up for election are known due to the expiration of the exisiting councillors terms. There has also been no publication of boundary changes and no Standing Orders have been passed by parliament modifying the boundaries. This means the ward names and alike are the same as when they were last contested. The wait and see argument is a bit bogus here as you wait and see until when? This is better discussed on the project page to discuss if there should be "cut off" date before the creation of election articles. --] (]) 21:45, 14 November 2011 (UTC) | *'''Oppose''' - The elections will take place and the date is already known as it is set out in statute and the wards up for election are known due to the expiration of the exisiting councillors terms. There has also been no publication of boundary changes and no Standing Orders have been passed by parliament modifying the boundaries. This means the ward names and alike are the same as when they were last contested. The wait and see argument is a bit bogus here as you wait and see until when? This is better discussed on the project page to discuss if there should be "cut off" date before the creation of election articles. --] (]) 21:45, 14 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
| **But having an empty article for the next few months is not really usefull. That is why I suggest to '''move''' it to your own userspace, untill there is more information available. Without candidates, it is pretty useless. But removing is silly. ] ] 22:23, 14 November 2011 (UTC) | **But having an empty article for the next few months is not really usefull. That is why I suggest to '''move''' it to your own userspace, untill there is more information available. Without candidates, it is pretty useless. But removing is silly. ] ] 22:23, 14 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
| ***In that case this is better considered on the article discussion page or on the creator’s user talk page. AfD is only meant for the nomination of articles for genuine and permanent deletion and not to discuss page moves or pages mergers.--] (]) 00:37, 15 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:37, 15 November 2011
Crawley Council election, 2012
- Crawley Council election, 2012 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:Crystal. Can perfectly be moved to the workspace of the author untill there is something more to tell about these elections, say March/April 2012! Night of the Big Wind talk 20:13, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose - The elections will take place and the date is already known as it is set out in statute and the wards up for election are known due to the expiration of the exisiting councillors terms. There has also been no publication of boundary changes and no Standing Orders have been passed by parliament modifying the boundaries. This means the ward names and alike are the same as when they were last contested. The wait and see argument is a bit bogus here as you wait and see until when? This is better discussed on the project page to discuss if there should be "cut off" date before the creation of election articles. --Lucy-marie (talk) 21:45, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- But having an empty article for the next few months is not really usefull. That is why I suggest to move it to your own userspace, untill there is more information available. Without candidates, it is pretty useless. But removing is silly. Night of the Big Wind talk 22:23, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- In that case this is better considered on the article discussion page or on the creator’s user talk page. AfD is only meant for the nomination of articles for genuine and permanent deletion and not to discuss page moves or pages mergers.--Lucy-marie (talk) 00:37, 15 November 2011 (UTC)