| Revision as of 22:53, 29 March 2006 editCarcharoth (talk | contribs)Administrators73,576 edits →Redirect was wrong← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:53, 29 March 2006 edit undoCarcharoth (talk | contribs)Administrators73,576 edits →Redirect was wrongNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Redirect was wrong == | == Redirect was wrong == | ||
| ]] |
]] | ||
| Hmm. ] currently redirects to ]. From reading ] I see that the former covered astrological stuff, while the latter covered astronomical stuff. Looks like that redirect is wrong. Anyone agree? ] 02:13, 28 March 2006 (UTC) | Hmm. ] currently redirects to ]. From reading ] I see that the former covered astrological stuff, while the latter covered astronomical stuff. Looks like that redirect is wrong. Anyone agree? ] 02:13, 28 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:53, 29 March 2006
Redirect was wrong
Hmm. Tetrabiblos currently redirects to Almagest. From reading Ptolemy I see that the former covered astrological stuff, while the latter covered astronomical stuff. Looks like that redirect is wrong. Anyone agree? Carcharoth 02:13, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
- I also noticed that problem. I have looked at both books and you are right, they are on different subjects. Plus, they are two separate books, making it like redirecting The Hobbit to Lord of the Rings. Someone needs to un-redirect. Maestlin 18:39, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
- For the moment I have blanked the redirect page so it no longer redirects. I think there are two options for now: (1) Someone writes a stub article; (2) The page is deleted until someone can write an article (thus turning the blue links red). At the moment, what is in Ptolemy#Astrology is sufficient. Copying that into Tetrabiblos is another option, but rather redundant. I've copied the above three comments to the discussion page for Tetrabiblos. Carcharoth 22:52, 29 March 2006 (UTC)