Misplaced Pages

User talk:Crotalus horridus/Archive 2: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:Crotalus horridus Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:14, 30 March 2006 editCrotalus horridus (talk | contribs)Rollbackers7,850 edits moved User talk:Crotalus horridus to User talk:Crotalus horridus/Archive: Archiving.  Revision as of 17:15, 30 March 2006 edit undoCrotalus horridus (talk | contribs)Rollbackers7,850 edits My final statement.Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT ] ]

<div style="background-color:black; padding: 1em; ">
<center>
{| style="background-color:black; color:white; padding: 1em;"
|-----
| <font color="white">
This is disgraceful.<br>
] means that Wikipedians are expected to be perfect - to never make mistakes. I have made mistakes in the past, as have most other editors. It is unconscionable that occasional, isolated lapses in editing judgment have been twisted into a justification for punishments that have no relation to the alleged offenses, and which ''even the other party'' to arbitration has called "completely over the top" and "utterly bonkers" .<br>
This decision means that none of my actual contributions to the encyclopedia matter - only my mistakes do. It means that no one can petition ArbCom without fear of retaliation, since no one is perfect.<br>
I will not be contributing to Misplaced Pages again in the forseeable future.<br>
- Crotalus horridus, 3/30/06.
|}</center></div>

Revision as of 17:15, 30 March 2006

Talk page archive.

This is disgraceful.
This Arbcom decision means that Wikipedians are expected to be perfect - to never make mistakes. I have made mistakes in the past, as have most other editors. It is unconscionable that occasional, isolated lapses in editing judgment have been twisted into a justification for punishments that have no relation to the alleged offenses, and which even the other party to arbitration has called "completely over the top" and "utterly bonkers" .
This decision means that none of my actual contributions to the encyclopedia matter - only my mistakes do. It means that no one can petition ArbCom without fear of retaliation, since no one is perfect.
I will not be contributing to Misplaced Pages again in the forseeable future.
- Crotalus horridus, 3/30/06.