| Revision as of 03:29, 22 November 2011 editJabbsworth (talk | contribs)567 edits →Comments by other users← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:44, 22 November 2011 edit undoJabbsworth (talk | contribs)567 edits →Comments by other users: unhealthyNext edit → | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
| * I refer the patrolling admin to Arbcom. I have discussed my socks and history with them, explained why they were necessary (and they were, for my own safety — real life stalking), and was cleared to edit. Collect is not aware of all this history. Ask Shell Kinney and Chase me Ladies. Thanks. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 03:23, 22 November 2011 (UTC) | * I refer the patrolling admin to Arbcom. I have discussed my socks and history with them, explained why they were necessary (and they were, for my own safety — real life stalking), and was cleared to edit. Collect is not aware of all this history. Ask Shell Kinney and Chase me Ladies. Thanks. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 03:23, 22 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
| ::I should add that this entry here is part of a content dispute. Collect deleted and has continued to delete , against the wishes of many editors, well sourced material that Jimbo Wales saw and did not say should be deleted. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 03:29, 22 November 2011 (UTC) | ::I should add that this entry here is part of a content dispute. Collect deleted and has continued to delete , against the wishes of many editors, well sourced material that Jimbo Wales saw and did not say should be deleted. So of we are talking about what's "healthy" for WP, I'd venture that it's Collect, the right wing party apparatchik (or so it seems to me), who spends all his time reverting RS-sourced material from the bios of his like-minded brethren, who is, in fact, the truly unhealthy presence on WP.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 03:29, 22 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | ||
Revision as of 03:44, 22 November 2011
Ratel
Ratel (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Ratel/Archive.
– This SPI case is open.
22 November 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Jabbsworth (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
New user with 436 edits - and intersecting at
- .Action_T4
- .Euthanasia
- .Exit_International
- .Ian_Dowbiggin
- .Jack_Kevorkian
- .Matt_Drudge
- .Non-voluntary_euthanasia
- .Philip_Nitschke
and talk pages at .Suicide_bag 10.Talk:Action_T4 11.Talk:Euthanasia 12.Talk:Ian_Dowbiggin 13.Talk:Suicide_bag 14.User talk:Collect 15.User talk:EdJohnston 16.User talk:Georgewilliamherbert
Including exact edits made by Ratel with edit summary from this new user of:
- This material was actually run past Jimbo at the time, and no objections were raised. You'll have to dig in the archives to find all the blow-by-blow. The sourcing is good
Similar edits to Ratel are found at the other articles - this user has a majority of all his edits on ones which Ratel edited, and the edits are similar in nature to his, and the edit summaries also. See for example with the edit summary of Another source, and there are more to come ... I do not see this as an urgent BLP issue. Dowbiggin has allowed these statements to stand for 8 years at sites he supports Jabbsworth was also IDed as Ratel at by Night of the Big Wind. As a result of which Jabbsworth was topic banned for 3 months from all the Euthanasia articles.
Note also Your baiting me will not work. I seriously doubt that ArbCom ever approved your creating the TickleMeister account two days after you were blocked for sockpuppetry in a !vote as Ratel/Unit5. If I'm wrong, ArbCom can correct me.Novangelis (talk) 03:01, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
In short - admirable evidence for Jabbsowrth being a sock of banned Ratel, and Jabbsworth appears to have been named as a sock of Ratel by several other editors. Cheers. Collect (talk) 03:07, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Also Jabbsworth states he has a total of about 12,000 edits - precisely in line with Ratel who is blocked for being a sockmaster. Cheers - I dinna think that his position on Misplaced Pages is healthy considering his opinions on WP:BLP etc. Cheers. Collect (talk) 03:18, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- I refer the patrolling admin to Arbcom. I have discussed my socks and history with them, explained why they were necessary (and they were, for my own safety — real life stalking), and was cleared to edit. Collect is not aware of all this history. Ask Shell Kinney and Chase me Ladies. Thanks. Jabbsworth 03:23, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
- I should add that this entry here is part of a content dispute. Collect deleted and has continued to delete , against the wishes of many editors, well sourced material that Jimbo Wales saw and did not say should be deleted. So of we are talking about what's "healthy" for WP, I'd venture that it's Collect, the right wing party apparatchik (or so it seems to me), who spends all his time reverting RS-sourced material from the bios of his like-minded brethren, who is, in fact, the truly unhealthy presence on WP. Jabbsworth 03:29, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Categories: