| Revision as of 00:22, 4 December 2011 editCailil (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,119 edits +1← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:14, 4 December 2011 edit undoCailil (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,119 editsm mark as done and re-orderNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <small> | <small> | ||
| #Theoretical schools: The second paragraph seems be entirely about literary theory. You need to place this paragraph in the context of feminist theory in general, showing us why a discussion of literary theory is appropriate here. | #Theoretical schools: The second paragraph seems be entirely about literary theory. You need to place this paragraph in the context of feminist theory in general, showing us why a discussion of literary theory is appropriate here. | ||
| ⚫ | #Literature section - the second two paragraphs may be overly specific, giving the names of a few important feminist texts instead of describing the general development of feminist literature as a whole. |
||
| #Science: Could a sentence or two explaining how these ideas differ from the traditional scientific view be added along with what the response of the scientific community to these ideas has been? | #Science: Could a sentence or two explaining how these ideas differ from the traditional scientific view be added along with what the response of the scientific community to these ideas has been? | ||
| #Lead: mention feminism's effects on society, since that is a major part of the article | #Lead: mention feminism's effects on society, since that is a major part of the article | ||
| Line 8: | Line 7: | ||
| #The "Late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries" section seems US-centric. What is going on in the rest of the world right now?{{partly done}} | #The "Late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries" section seems US-centric. What is going on in the rest of the world right now?{{partly done}} | ||
| #<s>Similarly, the article has a picture some Parisian suffragettes, but France is not even mentioned in the article body.</s>{{done}} | #<s>Similarly, the article has a picture some Parisian suffragettes, but France is not even mentioned in the article body.</s>{{done}} | ||
| ⚫ | #<s>Literature section - the second two paragraphs may be overly specific, giving the names of a few important feminist texts instead of describing the general development of feminist literature as a whole. The entire period from 1818 until the 1960s is skipped over. Undue weight may be given to ].</s>{{done}} | ||
| Please see ] | Please see ] | ||
Revision as of 15:14, 4 December 2011
- Theoretical schools: The second paragraph seems be entirely about literary theory. You need to place this paragraph in the context of feminist theory in general, showing us why a discussion of literary theory is appropriate here.
- Science: Could a sentence or two explaining how these ideas differ from the traditional scientific view be added along with what the response of the scientific community to these ideas has been?
- Lead: mention feminism's effects on society, since that is a major part of the article
- The movements & ideologies section may need reorganization in order to make it clearer and less complex for readers.
- Introduction to "Relationship to political movements" section needs revision.
- The "Late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries" section seems US-centric. What is going on in the rest of the world right now?
Partly done Similarly, the article has a picture some Parisian suffragettes, but France is not even mentioned in the article body.
DoneLiterature section - the second two paragraphs may be overly specific, giving the names of a few important feminist texts instead of describing the general development of feminist literature as a whole. The entire period from 1818 until the 1960s is skipped over. Undue weight may be given to feminist science fiction. Done
Please see Talk:Feminism/GA1