| Revision as of 17:42, 6 December 2011 view sourceNableezy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers56,155 edits →May be of interest← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:39, 6 December 2011 view source Someone35 (talk | contribs)1,110 edits →Do you have a job?: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
| :Perhaps I'm missing something, but I think that, given the diffs ( and ), WGFinley's statement, "I don't see what he did on Mount Hermon other than to point out there's a ski resort there and added a travel guide as source for information on that," is ridiculous. I also thought that it was a bit rich that WGFinley criticised Nableezy's tone, given his own, which comes across as condescending, self-regarding and self-opinionated to me. If WGFinley's intention is to reduce disruption in the I-P part of the project, I think that his methods will be self-defeating. <span style="font-family: Perpetua, serif; font-size:120%"> ← ] </span> 17:24, 6 December 2011 (UTC) | :Perhaps I'm missing something, but I think that, given the diffs ( and ), WGFinley's statement, "I don't see what he did on Mount Hermon other than to point out there's a ski resort there and added a travel guide as source for information on that," is ridiculous. I also thought that it was a bit rich that WGFinley criticised Nableezy's tone, given his own, which comes across as condescending, self-regarding and self-opinionated to me. If WGFinley's intention is to reduce disruption in the I-P part of the project, I think that his methods will be self-defeating. <span style="font-family: Perpetua, serif; font-size:120%"> ← ] </span> 17:24, 6 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
| ::That is what pissed me off. That he either had not even looked at the diffs or was purposely distorting their content. He has refused, repeatedly, to justify that comment, a comment that is plainly false, so much so that I think anybody who stands by that comment is incompetent and has no business coming near an encyclopedia, much less purporting to administer it. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - 17:42, 6 December 2011 (UTC)</small> | ::That is what pissed me off. That he either had not even looked at the diffs or was purposely distorting their content. He has refused, repeatedly, to justify that comment, a comment that is plainly false, so much so that I think anybody who stands by that comment is incompetent and has no business coming near an encyclopedia, much less purporting to administer it. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - 17:42, 6 December 2011 (UTC)</small> | ||
| == Do you have a job? == | |||
| Do you have a job? Since you seem to be all the day on Misplaced Pages, I wondered if you have a job-- ] 19:39, 6 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:39, 6 December 2011
I was smoking the other night and I began to violently cough. I coughed so hard that I pulled a muscle in my back. So what did I do next? Smoked some more to try to ease the pain.
Template:Archive box collapsible
Alon Shvut discussion at IPCOL
Hi Nableezy, just to let you know I asked for outside advice on disagreements over Alon Shvut that you're also party to. --MichaelNetzer (talk) 04:50, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Almon, Mateh Binyamin
You know, Nab, I think I try to explain myself and do things logically and in goodwill, but I know that like all humans everyone can make mistakes. In this case you're reasoning for moving the legal status section doesn't seem sensible. You say it's specific to the settlement but we both know it's not. It becomes relevant because of the land dispute but putting it before the land dispute is just bad composition and reeks of pushing an opinion in the reader's face at the expense of the quality of the article. I think we should try to work thing out but in all our discussions, I haven't felt an effort by you to understand or discuss the actual points being made. Again, maybe I'm not trying hard enough, but I'm wondering if you think you are. At any rate, we should try to avoid a blowout and I'm hoping you can try to be a little more amicable to the points I'm making. Or at least let me know that you understand what I'm saying and are giving it some consideration. --MichaelNetzer (talk) 16:58, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
- The first sentence of the section is, or was before your supposedly neutral partisan pal came to do his part, The international community considers all Israeli settlements in the Israeli-occupied territories, including Almon, to violate the Fourth Geneva Convention's prohibition on the transfer of an occupying power's civilian population into occupied territory. How exactly is that not specifically about Almon's status under international law? Also, it is getting a bit tiring seeing your incessant whinging about others supposed distortions. I have not yet actually said what exactly I think about your twisting the WESTBANK guideline into saying things it plainly opposes, but the word distortion would have been mild if I were to actually speak my mind. nableezy - 03:26, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- No need to hold back, Nableezy, I can take it. In the end everything said here is on record. When third parties who aren't involved eventually take a look at the exchanges, neither your claims nor mine will be enough to hold either side. The record will speak for itself. Which is more the reason to try showing some mutual understanding. -MichaelNetzer (talk) 04:36, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Maher Udda
Hi Nableezy, I removed the prod from Maher Udda. Al Jazeera reported that he was one of the founders of Hamas and I'd say that shows a longer relevance than just one event.--TM 21:51, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
- Al Jazeera didnt report that, they reported that the Israeli military described Udda as one of Hamas's founders. nableezy - 21:59, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
May be of interest
Hi Nableezy. I noticed you took strong exception to aspects of WGFinley's conduct at AE recently, as did Gatoclass. I posted a comment to Gatoclass' talk (permalink) that might help you better understand WGFinley's motivation. Cheers, – OhioStandard (talk) 08:45, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
- Perhaps I'm missing something, but I think that, given the diffs ( and ), WGFinley's statement, "I don't see what he did on Mount Hermon other than to point out there's a ski resort there and added a travel guide as source for information on that," is ridiculous. I also thought that it was a bit rich that WGFinley criticised Nableezy's tone, given his own, which comes across as condescending, self-regarding and self-opinionated to me. If WGFinley's intention is to reduce disruption in the I-P part of the project, I think that his methods will be self-defeating. ← ZScarpia 17:24, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
- That is what pissed me off. That he either had not even looked at the diffs or was purposely distorting their content. He has refused, repeatedly, to justify that comment, a comment that is plainly false, so much so that I think anybody who stands by that comment is incompetent and has no business coming near an encyclopedia, much less purporting to administer it. nableezy - 17:42, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Do you have a job?
Do you have a job? Since you seem to be all the day on Misplaced Pages, I wondered if you have a job-- Someone35 19:39, 6 December 2011 (UTC)