Misplaced Pages

User talk:Crotalus horridus/Archive 2: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:Crotalus horridus Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:15, 30 March 2006 editCrotalus horridus (talk | contribs)Rollbackers7,850 edits My final statement.← Previous edit Revision as of 15:28, 1 April 2006 edit undo59.167.142.207 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 12: Line 12:
- Crotalus horridus, 3/30/06. - Crotalus horridus, 3/30/06.
|}</center></div> |}</center></div>

If you want to, you can write on a Misplaced Pages discussion forum, where you can talk about your case, and any other issues with Misplaced Pages that you might have. The location is http://www.wikipediareview.com/

Revision as of 15:28, 1 April 2006

Talk page archive.

This is disgraceful.
This Arbcom decision means that Wikipedians are expected to be perfect - to never make mistakes. I have made mistakes in the past, as have most other editors. It is unconscionable that occasional, isolated lapses in editing judgment have been twisted into a justification for punishments that have no relation to the alleged offenses, and which even the other party to arbitration has called "completely over the top" and "utterly bonkers" .
This decision means that none of my actual contributions to the encyclopedia matter - only my mistakes do. It means that no one can petition ArbCom without fear of retaliation, since no one is perfect.
I will not be contributing to Misplaced Pages again in the forseeable future.
- Crotalus horridus, 3/30/06.

If you want to, you can write on a Misplaced Pages discussion forum, where you can talk about your case, and any other issues with Misplaced Pages that you might have. The location is http://www.wikipediareview.com/