| Revision as of 00:36, 2 April 2006 editKotepho (talk | contribs)4,214 edits →[]: k← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:04, 2 April 2006 edit undoFishhead64 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,294 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| Above links were added by: {{User|Riveros11}} 22:08, 1 April 2006 | Above links were added by: {{User|Riveros11}} 22:08, 1 April 2006 | ||
| *'''Keep''' Appears to be referenced, but the article ''could'' be improved. ] 22:19, 1 April 2006 (UTC) | *<s>'''Keep''' Appears to be referenced, but the article ''could'' be improved. ] 22:19, 1 April 2006 (UTC)</s> '''Delete''' per Fan1967's point. ] 01:04, 2 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' Even with references, the article is an attempt to synthesize a number of very differing viewpoints, and does qualify as ]. - ] 22:51, 1 April 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' Even with references, the article is an attempt to synthesize a number of very differing viewpoints, and does qualify as ]. - ] 22:51, 1 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 01:04, 2 April 2006
Cyclical time
Article was put up for prod as "Unreferenced pseudo-scientific nonsense", but the tag was removed without comment by the original author, so up for a vote it goes.
- Neutral DMG413 21:45, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as prod nominator. As far as I can tell, it goes to great length to argue that time is cyclical by invoking various famed physicists. At the moment, it is unreferenced and fails WP:OR and WP:V --Henrik 21:54, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as original research and crankery. Brian G. Crawford 21:59, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
Friedrich Nietsche (Eternal recurrence)
http://personal.ecu.edu/mccartyr/great/projects/Adams.htm
Henri Poincare: Poincare recurrence theorem
http://www.math.umd.edu/~lvrmr/History/Recurrence.html
Paul Steinhardt, Ph.D Princeton University
http://www.physics.princeton.edu/~steinh/dm2004.pdf
http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/steinhardt02/steinhardt02_index.html
Plato and Aristotle views on time and eternity
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0031-8094(196401)14%3A54%3C35%3ATNAEIP%3E2.0.CO%3B2-6
Time in ancient historiography
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0018-2656(1966)6%3C1%3ATIAH%3E2.0.CO%3B2-9
Please read this: http://www.spacedaily.com/news/cosmology-02c.html
and: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/bang.html
Above links were added by: Riveros11 (talk · contribs) 22:08, 1 April 2006
Keep Appears to be referenced, but the article could be improved. Fishhead64 22:19, 1 April 2006 (UTC)Delete per Fan1967's point. Fishhead64 01:04, 2 April 2006 (UTC)- Delete Even with references, the article is an attempt to synthesize a number of very differing viewpoints, and does qualify as original research. - Fan1967 22:51, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, original and crackpot --Deville (Talk) 00:32, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Keep I'm sure we can use an article on this concept and I don't think it is trying to merge them all into one but explain them all (but going about it the wrong way). Kotepho 00:36, 2 April 2006 (UTC)