| Revision as of 18:34, 13 December 2011 editBulwersator (talk | contribs)17,067 edits * Is it possible to take this survey? It sounds interesting. BTW, ads like this on our wiki are outrageous ~~~~← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:40, 13 December 2011 edit undoOrangemike (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators126,229 edits I was unaware that there was any such thing as "CentralNotice", much less a "CentralNotice/Calendar"Next edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| * "''as participants were not aware that they were sharing their usernames, edit counts, and user privileges with the study team.''" Wait...what? O_o I don't remember the survey saying that anywhere. Now I feel uncomfortable about having took it. I assumed it was going to be anonymous, as that would be the point of such a survey in the first place. That's also why I had the money be donated to the Red Cross, so that there wouldn't be any break in the anonymity with an actual Paypal account being required. <font color="silver">]</font><font color="blue">]</font><sup>]</sup> 18:29, 13 December 2011 (UTC) | * "''as participants were not aware that they were sharing their usernames, edit counts, and user privileges with the study team.''" Wait...what? O_o I don't remember the survey saying that anywhere. Now I feel uncomfortable about having took it. I assumed it was going to be anonymous, as that would be the point of such a survey in the first place. That's also why I had the money be donated to the Red Cross, so that there wouldn't be any break in the anonymity with an actual Paypal account being required. <font color="silver">]</font><font color="blue">]</font><sup>]</sup> 18:29, 13 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
| * Is it possible to take this survey? It sounds interesting. BTW, ads like this on our wiki are outrageous ] (]) 18:34, 13 December 2011 (UTC) | * Is it possible to take this survey? It sounds interesting. BTW, ads like this on our wiki are outrageous ] (]) 18:34, 13 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
| *I'm an admin; but until I read this report, I was unaware that there was any such thing as "CentralNotice", much less a "CentralNotice/Calendar". I still am unclear as to what they are and what their purpose might be (though I will look into it). What deluded anybody into thinking that posting a demolition notice on Alpha Centauri would constitute sufficient warning to the residents of Earth that we were about to be demolished to build a galactic bypass? --] | ] 19:40, 13 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:40, 13 December 2011
← Back to News and notes
Discuss this story
- "as participants were not aware that they were sharing their usernames, edit counts, and user privileges with the study team." Wait...what? O_o I don't remember the survey saying that anywhere. Now I feel uncomfortable about having took it. I assumed it was going to be anonymous, as that would be the point of such a survey in the first place. That's also why I had the money be donated to the Red Cross, so that there wouldn't be any break in the anonymity with an actual Paypal account being required. Silverseren 18:29, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- Is it possible to take this survey? It sounds interesting. BTW, ads like this on our wiki are outrageous Bulwersator (talk) 18:34, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- I'm an admin; but until I read this report, I was unaware that there was any such thing as "CentralNotice", much less a "CentralNotice/Calendar". I still am unclear as to what they are and what their purpose might be (though I will look into it). What deluded anybody into thinking that posting a demolition notice on Alpha Centauri would constitute sufficient warning to the residents of Earth that we were about to be demolished to build a galactic bypass? --Orange Mike | Talk 19:40, 13 December 2011 (UTC)