| Revision as of 13:53, 15 December 2011 edit173.238.69.86 (talk) →December 2011: you are not allowed to make vandalize this talk page and you are using claims of vandalism to coutner-act valid edits just because they oppose your viewpoints← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:56, 15 December 2011 edit undoDawn Bard (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers37,669 editsm please stop your disruptive editingNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| ] Please do not add commentary or your own ] to Misplaced Pages articles, as you did to ]. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's ] and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-npov2 --> <font face="Comic sans MS">]</font> <small><sup><font color="Blue">]</font><font color="Green">]</font></sup></small> 12:46, 15 December 2011 (UTC) | ] Please do not add commentary or your own ] to Misplaced Pages articles, as you did to ]. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's ] and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-npov2 --> <font face="Comic sans MS">]</font> <small><sup><font color="Blue">]</font><font color="Green">]</font></sup></small> 12:46, 15 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are in danger of breaking the ], or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. '''Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a ].''' | |||
| If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. You may still be blocked for ] even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 13:56, 15 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:56, 15 December 2011
December 2011
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Misplaced Pages articles, as you did to Bill Maher. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Paul Erik 12:46, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Palestinian people shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.
If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Dawn Bard (talk) 13:56, 15 December 2011 (UTC)