| Revision as of 17:44, 2 April 2006 editEternal Equinox (talk | contribs)4,840 edits →[]: If you look at...← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:51, 2 April 2006 edit undoGetcrunk (talk | contribs)6,946 edits changed vote full supportNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| The last ] had failed (both are documented in the same project page), and this time I am really striving to have this article become a ], something I am more than convinced it has finally reached. The writing's good, images are used where appropriate, and the notes and references may have gone a bit over-board, yet more is always best when it comes to nomination time. Please provide any suggestions, comments and criticism, and please remember to sign your name with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>)! Thanks! Let's begin this lengthy process. —] | ] 15:39, 2 April 2006 (UTC) | The last ] had failed (both are documented in the same project page), and this time I am really striving to have this article become a ], something I am more than convinced it has finally reached. The writing's good, images are used where appropriate, and the notes and references may have gone a bit over-board, yet more is always best when it comes to nomination time. Please provide any suggestions, comments and criticism, and please remember to sign your name with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>)! Thanks! Let's begin this lengthy process. —] | ] 15:39, 2 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Weak support''': categories aren't in alphabetical order. (Also, I think that the sample should be in "Music and structure", and that there are too many chart positions in the infobox.) -- ]]] 16:10, 2 April 2006 (UTC) | * '''<s>Weak</s> support''': categories aren't in alphabetical order. (Also, I think that the sample should be in "Music and structure", and that there are too many chart positions in the infobox.) -- ]]] 16:10, 2 April 2006 (UTC) Changed vote -- ]]] 17:51, 2 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ** '''Comment''' Just put the cat's in alphabetical order. --<b><font color="666666">]</font><font color="#000000">]</font></b><sup> (])</sup> 16:35, 2 April 2006 (UTC) | ** '''Comment''' Just put the cat's in alphabetical order. --<b><font color="666666">]</font><font color="#000000">]</font></b><sup> (])</sup> 16:35, 2 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ***Done. '']'' <sub>]</sub> 17:32, 2 April 2006 (UTC) | ***Done. '']'' <sub>]</sub> 17:32, 2 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:51, 2 April 2006
We Belong Together
The last two nominations had failed (both are documented in the same project page), and this time I am really striving to have this article become a featured article, something I am more than convinced it has finally reached. The writing's good, images are used where appropriate, and the notes and references may have gone a bit over-board, yet more is always best when it comes to nomination time. Please provide any suggestions, comments and criticism, and please remember to sign your name with four tildes (~~~~)! Thanks! Let's begin this lengthy process. —Eternal Equinox | talk 15:39, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Weaksupport: categories aren't in alphabetical order. (Also, I think that the sample should be in "Music and structure", and that there are too many chart positions in the infobox.) -- getcrunkjuice 16:10, 2 April 2006 (UTC) Changed vote -- getcrunkjuice 17:51, 2 April 2006 (UTC)- Comment Just put the cat's in alphabetical order. --lightdarkness 16:35, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Done. AndyZ t 17:32, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Just put the cat's in alphabetical order. --lightdarkness 16:35, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- If you look at several other featured articles on music-singles, many of the samples have its own individual section so that it is easier to locate. Yes, there are many charts, however, Misplaced Pages is here to summarize the facts and not exlcude any that are collected. Although I'm positive three charts had been removed from the list earlier this month. Thanks for your vote. —Eternal Equinox | talk 17:44, 2 April 2006 (UTC)