Misplaced Pages

talk:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2011-12-19/In the news: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Misplaced Pages Signpost Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:59, 21 December 2011 editResident Mario (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,332 edits +← Previous edit Revision as of 05:29, 21 December 2011 edit undoSven Manguard (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers46,502 edits Criticism of JimboNext edit →
Line 4: Line 4:
Well, even if we don't get Wysiwyg, at least Misplaced Pages is easier to use than Facebook! (ducking for cover) :-) -- ] (]) 04:26, 21 December 2011 (UTC) Well, even if we don't get Wysiwyg, at least Misplaced Pages is easier to use than Facebook! (ducking for cover) :-) -- ] (]) 04:26, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
:Facebook is easy to use, what are you talking about o_O. <span style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica"><b><font color="#333">]</font></b><font color="#444">]</font></span> 04:59, 21 December 2011 (UTC) :Facebook is easy to use, what are you talking about o_O. <span style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica"><b><font color="#333">]</font></b><font color="#444">]</font></span> 04:59, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

It's no secret that I'm a critic of Jimbo, his cult of personality, and his willingness to both manipulate to further his own agenda but also deny the existence/effect of said cult of personality. I don't think that his ''intention'' was to whip up an international media frenzy when he started the thread on his talk page, but then removing that discussion without archiving it, after it had been covered by the international media... for god's sake that's a poor move. On a website that prided itself on a publicly viewable history for every change that is made, burying the conversation both looks improper and is rather ineffective. ] ] 05:29, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:29, 21 December 2011



← Back to In the news

Discuss this story

Well, even if we don't get Wysiwyg, at least Misplaced Pages is easier to use than Facebook! (ducking for cover) :-) -- Ssilvers (talk) 04:26, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Facebook is easy to use, what are you talking about o_O. ResMar 04:59, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

It's no secret that I'm a critic of Jimbo, his cult of personality, and his willingness to both manipulate to further his own agenda but also deny the existence/effect of said cult of personality. I don't think that his intention was to whip up an international media frenzy when he started the thread on his talk page, but then removing that discussion without archiving it, after it had been covered by the international media... for god's sake that's a poor move. On a website that prided itself on a publicly viewable history for every change that is made, burying the conversation both looks improper and is rather ineffective. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:29, 21 December 2011 (UTC)