Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 22:08, 3 April 2006

Your idea that the commas following names are undesirable is interesting, but it may be they are there for specific reasons that you don't understand. My guess is that they were put there when enormous numbers of names were added by an automated procedure, and it is likely you obstructing future use of such methods.

I'd suggest you start a discussion at Talk:List of people by name, and i'm likely to go thru rapidly reverting what you've done, since doing so is easier if done earlier. --Jerzy(t) 20:02, 2004 Apr 7 (UTC)

Hello, welcome to Misplaced Pages.

You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Misplaced Pages:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)

• List of analog television stations in the Philippines
• Valentino Rossi
• Bhumij rebellion
• Four Quls

• Certificate Authority Security Council
• Pulmonary embolism
• Euerdorf
• ATA over Ethernet
• Northern Savonia (parliamentary electoral district)

• Dzhalykovo
• Zaagin Sala
• Lake Tsagan-Khak
• Baatud
• David Kugultinov

• Joel Ferri
• Sans-culottes
• Google Arts & Culture
• Perak Tengah District
• Lyn Frazier

• Ruthie Bolton
• Granville L. Maret
• Pathfinding
• Korean National Youth Association
• Little green men

• 2015 Lima Challenger – Singles
• Tokugawa Yoshinao
• Linnaemya
• Wood-free paper
• Salvatore De Renzi

• Northern Crossing (shopping mall)
• National Zoo & Aquarium
• National Library of Guyana
• Namık Kemal House Museum, Tekirdağ
• New Moti Bagh

• Gaetano Saya
• ÖBB Class 4020
• Knulp
• ASD Forza e Coraggio
• Mir Mehdi Etimad

Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.

Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.

You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks: How to edit a page, show preview, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Fennec 20:34, 9 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thank you for reverting the vandalism done by 130.113.226.6 to my user page. AscendedAnathema 19:31, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

User page

Hi. Just a note to say thanks for the reverts to my user page. Cheers TigerShark 11:10, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Test Templates

Please subst test templates when you use them by typing "{{subst:<name of template>}}". This helps to reduce stress on the servers. Thanks! — Super-Magician (talk • contribs • count) ★ 17:11, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

My RfA

Thank you for your support in my request for adminship. I'm delighted that the RfA succeeded with a final consensus of 52/17/7, and receiving comments including having 'excellent potential to become a great moderator', and I am now an administrator. It did however only just pass, and I shall do my very best to rectify any of my errors, including the general belief that I should do more article work. If you have any concerns, or if you ever feel that I may be able to help you, please feel free to leave a message on my talk page. Again, thank you!

H. James Birx

It's not an edit war, in fact (though it looks like it). User:Kolriv was blocked by another admin for a 3RR violation on another article; he has created a string of sock-puppets to evade that block, and each one is permanently blocked and its edits reverted. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 22:59, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Still, you don't have to revert over such a trivial matter just because the other user is blocked. Margana 23:11, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

First, it is in fact usual policy: blocked users' edits are reverted. Secondly, his edit in any case makes the article look cramped, with the stubs too close to the text. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 09:48, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

AFD

Remeber the Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Charlie Sheen and Alex Jones interviews? It reached nothing even remotly resembling consensus, but it was deleted anyway? Please join the debate regarding undeleting it. I view this as nothing more as the majority imposing their will on the minority, in a blatant violation of the spirit of wikipedia --Striver 22:08, 3 April 2006 (UTC)