Misplaced Pages

:Follow the principle of least astonishment: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →
Revision as of 21:36, 30 December 2011 editYoureallycan (talk | contribs)12,095 edits Reverted good faith edits by Bulwersator (talk): Why . using TW← Previous edit Revision as of 22:00, 30 December 2011 edit undoImzadi1979 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors151,568 editsm moved Misplaced Pages:POLA to Misplaced Pages:Follow the principle of least astonishment: expanding out the title of the page... the previous title is in the style of shortcutsNext edit →
(No difference)

Revision as of 22:00, 30 December 2011

Follow the principle of least astonishment

Shortcut

The Wikimedia Foundation passed a Resolution on controversial content, urging "the community to pay particular attention to curating all kinds of potentially controversial content, including determining whether it has a realistic educational use and applying the principle of least astonishment in categorization and placement."

The resolution emphasizes that controversial content includes "that of a sexual, violent or religious nature" if it "may be offensive to some viewers", for example because they find "such content is disrespectful or inappropriate for themselves, their families or their students", even though others may "find it acceptable" because of differences "in age, background and values".

Additionally, the Foundation has committed itself to develop a personal image filter, which would take into account the reader's choices when displaying images. Following this WMF Board decision, a referendum was held to assess the importance of various aspects of the feature to the community. The filter is still in the design stage however; for further information see meta:Controversial content and meta:Image filter referendum/Next steps/en.

While the resolution does not provide a definition for the principle of least astonishment, the following pages that were part of the workflow leading to the resolution and design of the personal image filter may be helpful in that respect: m:Image filter referendum/FAQ/en#What is the principle of least astonishment? and m:2010 Wikimedia Study of Controversial Content: Part Two#Explanations 2. (Note that parts of this study were superseded by m:Controversial content/Board report and by the resolution itself.)

See also

Notes

  1. See email clarification for scope: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2011-December/071089.html
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "typical" is not used in the content (see the help page). Category: