Talk:Prakash Raj: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 07:23, 1 November 2010 edit116.73.163.159 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:33, 2 January 2012 edit undoDharmadhyaksha (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users47,968 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 53:		Line 53:
	==Keep tamil chauvinist editors out of here==		==Keep tamil chauvinist editors out of here==
	i don't understand why tamil is being added in the lang temp.the name prakash raj itself is pure sanskrit and prakash raj has acted in mutiple language films hindi malayalam kannada etc.does that mean every lang template will be added. think mother tongue should be enough as per wki policy and his mother tongue is Tulu (a heavily sanskritised south indian language) and also he is an upper caste Bunt who have north indian origins.so some north indian fan will come and demand hindi should also be added.think wiki should restrict it's lang template to mother tongue or add not language template at all.] (]) 07:22, 1 November 2010 (UTC)		i don't understand why tamil is being added in the lang temp.the name prakash raj itself is pure sanskrit and prakash raj has acted in mutiple language films hindi malayalam kannada etc.does that mean every lang template will be added. think mother tongue should be enough as per wki policy and his mother tongue is Tulu (a heavily sanskritised south indian language) and also he is an upper caste Bunt who have north indian origins.so some north indian fan will come and demand hindi should also be added.think wiki should restrict it's lang template to mother tongue or add not language template at all.] (]) 07:22, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

			==Mentioning Caste==
			Dear Editors!<br> There has been a discussion on India Portal related to mentioning of caste of subjects. The point is that mentioning caste of people, who have nothing to do with their caste, is found to be unnecessary by few editors. Hence the caste of the subject person needs to be deleted from the biography. I am not deleting the caste as of now but am only posting this here so that the regular editors of this article are well aware of it beforehand and no edit-wars take place. For details of discussion held on the portal please refer ]. Your views if any are welcome there or even here. <br> And.... as the reasons of exclusion of caste pointed out were "irrelavant to notability of subject person", "privacy of the subject person", "inclusion of caste is like branding individuals", etc. other information included in the article which also fall under these cases will also be removed after discussions. Examples of it included religion, non-notable spouse's and children's and parents' information, previous occupation, lived in places, non-notability related educational qualification, etc. <br> Your views on this are also welcome here or at the India portal. -] (]) 13:33, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:33, 2 January 2012

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Prakash Raj article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography Stub‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

India: Karnataka / Cinema Stub‑class Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Karnataka.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup.

Prakash Raj, name controversy

Read this to understand why he is known as Prakash Rai

Prakash rai hailing from south canara(karnataka) should'nt have changed his name to raj.

Prakash, Please show ur solidarity to kannada Industry (read Film industry) also. Also, keep your original name..

He could have changed the name because he found it more appealing to the tincle world. Why is it being portrayed as anti Kannada?

Do you recognize this name? --> Singanalluru Puttaswamayya Muthuraju Can you say he betrayed kannada because he changed his name?--Gthorvey (talk) 19:47, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

There is no controversy on the Telugu film "Parugu"

Prakash Raj was already banned once by the Telugu film Industry as he was never on time for some movies and refused to act in some after he had conflicts with the directors or Producers.

There is NO controversy, he had a birth name, (no citation added for this fact), which he changed, read screen name to Prakash Raj, confirmed by Govt. of India website - "55th NATIONAL FILM AWARDS FOR THE YEAR 2007" (PDF). Press Information Bureau (Govt. of India)., Hence the title is misleading --Ekabhishek 05:28, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Information needed

Nothing has been mentioned about married life of Prakash Raj. Can anybody update this information with some reliable sources? And Similarly Sources need to be stated as to why he has been banned from Telugu films for some time. --రవిచంద్ర (talk) 07:32, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

About the table

You can revert the table if you(editors) don't like it. Xxxsacheinxxx (talk) 11:02, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

PRAKASH RAJ IS GREAT

PRAKASH RAJ IS GREAT ACTOR. IF HE IS NOT IN THE MOVIE, WE FEEL THAT, IT IS WASTE TO WATCH THE MOVIE. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.192.228.26 (talk) 14:02, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Debut In Hindi Films

The awards section of the article mentions Prakash Raj has been awarded 2010 -Filmfare Award for Best Male Debut -Wanted.

But if i remember correctly he has acted in the film Khakee in 2004.

Isn't the information confusing and misleading. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajaxr77 (talk • contribs) 05:58, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Keep tamil chauvinist editors out of here

i don't understand why tamil is being added in the lang temp.the name prakash raj itself is pure sanskrit and prakash raj has acted in mutiple language films hindi malayalam kannada etc.does that mean every lang template will be added. think mother tongue should be enough as per wki policy and his mother tongue is Tulu (a heavily sanskritised south indian language) and also he is an upper caste Bunt who have north indian origins.so some north indian fan will come and demand hindi should also be added.think wiki should restrict it's lang template to mother tongue or add not language template at all.116.73.163.159 (talk) 07:22, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Mentioning Caste

Dear Editors!
There has been a discussion on India Portal related to mentioning of caste of subjects. The point is that mentioning caste of people, who have nothing to do with their caste, is found to be unnecessary by few editors. Hence the caste of the subject person needs to be deleted from the biography. I am not deleting the caste as of now but am only posting this here so that the regular editors of this article are well aware of it beforehand and no edit-wars take place. For details of discussion held on the portal please refer Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#Mentioning_caste_of_Individuals. Your views if any are welcome there or even here.
And.... as the reasons of exclusion of caste pointed out were "irrelavant to notability of subject person", "privacy of the subject person", "inclusion of caste is like branding individuals", etc. other information included in the article which also fall under these cases will also be removed after discussions. Examples of it included religion, non-notable spouse's and children's and parents' information, previous occupation, lived in places, non-notability related educational qualification, etc.
Your views on this are also welcome here or at the India portal. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 13:33, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Categories: