| Revision as of 03:06, 7 January 2012 view sourceYoureallycan (talk | contribs)12,095 edits →Hertzog bodyguarding← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:50, 7 January 2012 view source Drawit4u (talk | contribs)5 edits →Biophysicist's E-Book: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| All uploaded on the 2 Jan - looks like promotional creation to me - - I nominated a couple for deletion, as require evidence of permission, they are all cut and copy paste imo - lets see if the uploader will send the otrs declaration. ] (]) 03:05, 7 January 2012 (UTC) | All uploaded on the 2 Jan - looks like promotional creation to me - - I nominated a couple for deletion, as require evidence of permission, they are all cut and copy paste imo - lets see if the uploader will send the otrs declaration. ] (]) 03:05, 7 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
| == Biophysicist's E-Book == | |||
| Two of those three e-books you just deleted were in the article up until the recent edit war, from publication until 30 December 2011. Crowsnest did most of the editing during that time. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Douglas_Youvan&oldid=468678612 . | |||
| Also, the most recent User that was banned made no legal threat. They simply stated fact that Youvan has several multimillion dollar settlements. Coming in from Commons, for the first time, my reading of this is that there is a conflict between the biophysicist and Crowsnest, including a financial position by the latter in ocean wave power and an association with MIT. | |||
| On Commons, Crowsnest attempted to delete one of the biophysicist's figures that sets an early priority date for structure in the genetic code, now used as the 4th figure in ] with 600,000 hits per year. Another editor pointed out that it was most likely a carry-over of a Creation / Intelligent Design / Evolution debate from this encyclopedia. | |||
| Now there is an image of a letter at Commons from the biophysicist. We are trying to get him to delete it, but other than a fairly weak argument on Scope, it is going to appear like censorship. | |||
| So, I ask you to turn back the article to my most recent edit before your revert, protect the article, and let's save the foundation a lot of time and money. This is going to get ugly. ] (]) 03:50, 7 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
| You may start a talk page for me or answer me here. ] (]) 03:50, 7 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:50, 7 January 2012
 Archives |
|
|
Your unexplained reverts of my edits at Black Swan
- Regarding your recent reverting history at Black Swan (film), you and the other editor have failed to provide sufficient rationale for the reverts, even though I have explained my reasoning for the inclusion of quotes from one of the individuals at the centre of the controversy. Please see WP:REVEXP and WP:ROWN for the proper etiquette when reverting. Saint91 (talk) 18:30, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Black Swan (film), Talk:Black Swan (film)". Thank you. Saint91 (talk) 16:03, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Herzog body-guarding
All uploaded on the 2 Jan - looks like promotional creation to me - see commons - I nominated a couple for deletion, as require evidence of permission, they are all cut and copy paste imo - lets see if the uploader will send the otrs declaration. Youreallycan (talk) 03:05, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Biophysicist's E-Book
Two of those three e-books you just deleted were in the article up until the recent edit war, from publication until 30 December 2011. Crowsnest did most of the editing during that time. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Douglas_Youvan&oldid=468678612 .
Also, the most recent User that was banned made no legal threat. They simply stated fact that Youvan has several multimillion dollar settlements. Coming in from Commons, for the first time, my reading of this is that there is a conflict between the biophysicist and Crowsnest, including a financial position by the latter in ocean wave power and an association with MIT.
On Commons, Crowsnest attempted to delete one of the biophysicist's figures that sets an early priority date for structure in the genetic code, now used as the 4th figure in Genetic Code with 600,000 hits per year. Another editor pointed out that it was most likely a carry-over of a Creation / Intelligent Design / Evolution debate from this encyclopedia.
Now there is an image of a letter at Commons from the biophysicist. We are trying to get him to delete it, but other than a fairly weak argument on Scope, it is going to appear like censorship.
So, I ask you to turn back the article to my most recent edit before your revert, protect the article, and let's save the foundation a lot of time and money. This is going to get ugly. Drawit4u (talk) 03:50, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
You may start a talk page for me or answer me here. Drawit4u (talk) 03:50, 7 January 2012 (UTC)