| Revision as of 05:31, 8 January 2012 view sourceMathsci (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers66,107 editsm →08 January 2012← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:08, 8 January 2012 view source 94.197.2.224 (talk) →Comments by other users: So if Mathsci does not want a checkuser, what do they want out of this report?Next edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== | ||
| <small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> | <small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> | ||
| * So if Mathsci does not want a checkuser, what do they want out of this report? ] (]) 10:08, 8 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
| * BTW, Mathsci probably wants to add {{user|W.M. O'Quinlan}} to this report. ] (]) 10:08, 8 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | ||
Revision as of 10:08, 8 January 2012
Echigo mole
Echigo mole (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Echigo mole/Archive.
– This SPI case is open.
08 January 2012
- Suspected sockpuppets
- 94.196.63.228 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Echigo mole / A.K.Nole is back again with his standard disruption during an ArbCom case, this time leaving another trolling message on the ArbCom clerk's talk page. Exactly the same range of IPs as used in the previous report. Note that I am not requesting checkuser here. Mathsci (talk) 05:31, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- So if Mathsci does not want a checkuser, what do they want out of this report? 94.197.2.224 (talk) 10:08, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- BTW, Mathsci probably wants to add W.M. O'Quinlan (talk · contribs) to this report. 94.197.2.224 (talk) 10:08, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Categories: