Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Echigo mole: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:45, 9 January 2012 view sourceMathsci (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers66,107 edits →08 January 2012← Previous edit Revision as of 07:35, 10 January 2012 view source 94.197.63.103 (talk) →Comments by other users: Never edit or move someone's comment to change its meaning. Striking text constitutes a change in meaning, and should only be done by the user who wrote it or someone acting at their explicit request WP:TPONext edit →
Line 30: Line 30:
* So if Mathsci does not want a checkuser, what do they want out of this report? ] (]) 10:08, 8 January 2012 (UTC) * So if Mathsci does not want a checkuser, what do they want out of this report? ] (]) 10:08, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
* BTW, Mathsci probably wants to add {{user|W.M. O'Quinlan}} to this report. ] (]) 10:08, 8 January 2012 (UTC) * BTW, Mathsci probably wants to add {{user|W.M. O'Quinlan}} to this report. ] (]) 10:08, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
<s>* Perhaps we could take the opportunity to clarify a few points. * Perhaps we could take the opportunity to clarify a few points.
:* Mathsci is in the habit of associating ] to other users he has historically held a grudge against: there are convenient lists of his current victims and at his sockpuppet page. Is there any evidence, part from his often-repeated assertions, that Mr Mole is all, some or any of these other editors? :* Mathsci is in the habit of associating ] to other users he has historically held a grudge against: there are convenient lists of his current victims and at his sockpuppet page. Is there any evidence, part from his often-repeated assertions, that Mr Mole is all, some or any of these other editors?
:* Should Mathsci be retaining these pages, especially under a sock-puppet account, or do they violate ]? :* Should Mathsci be retaining these pages, especially under a sock-puppet account, or do they violate ]?
:* Mathsci is in the habit of tagging the pages of people he is reporting here as sock-puppets, before any decision and in some cases even before the report. Is he an SPI clerk or admin, and should be be doing this? :* Mathsci is in the habit of tagging the pages of people he is reporting here as sock-puppets, before any decision and in some cases even before the report. Is he an SPI clerk or admin, and should be be doing this?
:* Mathsci is in the habit of reverting edits he doesn't like , , , , in some cases even before reporting them here. Should he be doing that? :* Mathsci is in the habit of reverting edits he doesn't like , , , , in some cases even before reporting them here. Should he be doing that?
:* Mathsci's excuse for those reversions is that Echigo Mole is "banned". Is there any evidence for that, or has he just imagined it? ] (]) 22:37, 9 January 2012 (UTC)</s> :* Mathsci's excuse for those reversions is that Echigo Mole is "banned". Is there any evidence for that, or has he just imagined it? ] (]) 22:37, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
::And just to underscore his contempt for the orderly conduct of SPI cases, Mathsci repeats his violation of ] ("Never edit or move someone's comment to change its meaning, even on your own talk page. Striking text constitutes a change in meaning, and should only be done by the user who wrote it or someone acting at their explicit request.") I suppose that rules are for other people? ] (]) 07:35, 10 January 2012 (UTC)


======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>======

Revision as of 07:35, 10 January 2012

Echigo mole

Echigo mole (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Echigo mole/Archive.

– This SPI case is open.

08 January 2012
Suspected sockpuppets


Echigo mole / A.K.Nole is back again with his standard disruption during an ArbCom case, this time leaving trolling messages on the ArbCom clerk's talk page. Exactly the same range of IPs as used in the previous report. Note that I am not requesting checkuser here. Perhaps if the IP range is only used by Echigo mole, it should be blocked for a period. Mathsci (talk) 05:31, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Contrary to what A.K.Nole / Echigo mole suggests below, I do not wish to add any usernames to this report. There is more WP:DUCK however. Mathsci (talk) 10:34, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • Mathsci is in the habit of associating User:Echigo Mole to other users he has historically held a grudge against: there are convenient lists of his current victims here and here at his sockpuppet page. Is there any evidence, part from his often-repeated assertions, that Mr Mole is all, some or any of these other editors?
  • Should Mathsci be retaining these pages, especially under a sock-puppet account, or do they violate WP:HUSH?
  • Mathsci is in the habit of tagging the pages of people he is reporting here as sock-puppets, before any decision and in some cases even before the report. Is he an SPI clerk or admin, and should be be doing this?
  • Mathsci is in the habit of reverting edits he doesn't like , , , , in some cases even before reporting them here. Should he be doing that?
  • Mathsci's excuse for those reversions is that Echigo Mole is "banned". Is there any evidence for that, or has he just imagined it? 94.197.43.15 (talk) 22:37, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
And just to underscore his contempt for the orderly conduct of SPI cases, Mathsci repeats his violation of WP:TPO ("Never edit or move someone's comment to change its meaning, even on your own talk page. Striking text constitutes a change in meaning, and should only be done by the user who wrote it or someone acting at their explicit request.") I suppose that rules are for other people? 94.197.63.103 (talk) 07:35, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Categories: