| Revision as of 15:51, 14 January 2012 editFeydHuxtable (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,615 edits →Civility and vote weighing for borderline RfAs: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:58, 16 January 2012 edit undoRisker (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators28,295 edits →SOPA Blackout January 18 - effect on RFA: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| There's been an interesting discussion over at RfA talk, where its came to light that at least one oppose voter is reluctant to soften criticism in case it weakens their Oppose in close call situations. Per "Stated simply, editors should always treat each other with consideration and respect." from WP:Civility and my general impression of Crats, Id guess you actually give more weight to constructive thoughtful oppose votes like , compared to overly terse or otherwise non constructive !votes. Folk have been looking for workable incremental improvements that could be made to the levels of civility at RfA, so if its true you'd give weighting to the more constructive opposes, maybe one of you could make a statement to confirm? ] (]) 15:51, 14 January 2012 (UTC) | There's been an interesting discussion over at RfA talk, where its came to light that at least one oppose voter is reluctant to soften criticism in case it weakens their Oppose in close call situations. Per "Stated simply, editors should always treat each other with consideration and respect." from WP:Civility and my general impression of Crats, Id guess you actually give more weight to constructive thoughtful oppose votes like , compared to overly terse or otherwise non constructive !votes. Folk have been looking for workable incremental improvements that could be made to the levels of civility at RfA, so if its true you'd give weighting to the more constructive opposes, maybe one of you could make a statement to confirm? ] (]) 15:51, 14 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
| == SOPA Blackout January 18 - effect on RFA == | |||
| Note that the RFC with respect to the January 18 SOPA blackout proposal has now been]. The closing discussion recommends that any ongoing RFA be suspended during the 24-hour blackout. ] (]) 23:58, 16 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:58, 16 January 2012
 Bureaucrats' noticeboard archives |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
For sensitive matters, you may contact an individual bureaucrat directly by e-mail.You may use this tool to locate recently active bureaucrats. Click here to add a new section Shortcuts
The Bureaucrats' noticeboard is a place where items related to the Bureaucrats can be discussed and coordinated. Any user is welcome to leave a message or join the discussion here. Please start a new section for each topic.
This is not a forum for grievances. It is a specific noticeboard addressing Bureaucrat-related issues. If you want to know more about an action by a particular bureaucrat, you should first raise the matter with them on their talk page. Please stay on topic, remain civil, and remember to assume good faith. Take extraneous comments or threads to relevant talk pages.
If you are here to report that an RFA or an RFB is "overdue" or "expired", please wait at least 12 hours from the scheduled end time before making a post here about it. There are a fair number of active bureaucrats; and an eye is being kept on the time remaining on these discussions. Thank you for your patience.
To request that your administrator status be removed, initiate a new section below.
| Crat tasks | |
|---|---|
| RfAs | 0 |
| RfBs | 0 |
| Overdue RfBs | 0 |
| Overdue RfAs | 0 |
| BRFAs | 15 |
| Approved BRFAs | 0 |
| No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful) |
 | It is 21:07:18 on December 30, 2024, according to the server's time and date. |
ManawatuNZ would like a name change to "Little Bellbird"
I'm helping her out. Her current name is related to a "real-world" group. Please see her talk page. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 21:03, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Done Someone please remember to unblock her. MBisanz 21:31, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
WikiRevival
Greetings! I'd be much obliged if my adminship could be restored; I'm in the process of recovery from a two-year WikiDeath. Cheers! — madman bum and angel 22:41, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
- Done as clearly uncontroversial following removal for inactivity; welcome back! I recently returned myself. -- Pakaran 04:23, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Civility and vote weighing for borderline RfAs
There's been an interesting discussion over at RfA talk, where its came to light that at least one oppose voter is reluctant to soften criticism in case it weakens their Oppose in close call situations. Per "Stated simply, editors should always treat each other with consideration and respect." from WP:Civility and my general impression of Crats, Id guess you actually give more weight to constructive thoughtful oppose votes like this , compared to overly terse or otherwise non constructive !votes. Folk have been looking for workable incremental improvements that could be made to the levels of civility at RfA, so if its true you'd give weighting to the more constructive opposes, maybe one of you could make a statement to confirm? FeydHuxtable (talk) 15:51, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
SOPA Blackout January 18 - effect on RFA
Note that the RFC with respect to the January 18 SOPA blackout proposal has now beenclosed in favour of a global blackout. The closing discussion recommends that any ongoing RFA be suspended during the 24-hour blackout. Risker (talk) 23:58, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
Categories: