| Revision as of 02:35, 14 January 2012 view sourceFæ (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers83,148 edits ce | Revision as of 04:08, 17 January 2012 view source Jrf (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users618 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| An article you made serious cuts to some time ago has been restored to its unsourced/non-neutral version. I was going to clean it up to remove some of the non-neutrality and lack of sourcing, but I thought you might wish to intervene first. Your edits are <span class="plainlinks"></span>, and the restoration of the old content is <span class="plainlinks"></span>. —] <small><sup>]</sup></small>/<small>]</small> 20:56, 12 January 2012 (UTC) | An article you made serious cuts to some time ago has been restored to its unsourced/non-neutral version. I was going to clean it up to remove some of the non-neutrality and lack of sourcing, but I thought you might wish to intervene first. Your edits are <span class="plainlinks"></span>, and the restoration of the old content is <span class="plainlinks"></span>. —] <small><sup>]</sup></small>/<small>]</small> 20:56, 12 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
| :I thought about rolling back, but I'm not sure it's that simple. The article has a real problem being single-sourced, however, I think this can be resolved by improvement rather than just cutting it back to a stub as I suspect reasonable mention in sources (esp. non-English) can be uncovered. I agree that the non-neutral text needs to be trimmed. Bit busy, so I'll probably not get around to looking further. Cheers --] (]) 06:52, 13 January 2012 (UTC) | :I thought about rolling back, but I'm not sure it's that simple. The article has a real problem being single-sourced, however, I think this can be resolved by improvement rather than just cutting it back to a stub as I suspect reasonable mention in sources (esp. non-English) can be uncovered. I agree that the non-neutral text needs to be trimmed. Bit busy, so I'll probably not get around to looking further. Cheers --] (]) 06:52, 13 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
| Hi Fæ, I'm still hoping to get your feedback on the ] (TREC) article -- see question in talk page. If you agree that the citations have been improved, we'd like to remove the notability flag that you attached. Perhaps of interest to you and other Wikipedians is the ] (]) | |||
Revision as of 04:08, 17 January 2012
| Click to start a new talk topic |
| Please do not remove trolling or vandalism from this page without emailing me for confirmation first.
If you wish to contact me about any Wikimedia UK chapter matters, please email me using this email form, rather than leaving a message on my user page or on a Misplaced Pages noticeboard. Any email indicated as confidential will be limited to discussion with board members and full time staff in line with Charity Commission requirements. |
 Archives |
|
2010 2011 2012 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
 | Disclaimer Any opinions expressed on Misplaced Pages, sister projects or in tweets and blog posts are mine and do not represent the opinion of Wikimedia UK or any other organization that I am affiliated with. – Fæ |
Ho Yan Hor Herbal Tea
An article you made serious cuts to some time ago has been restored to its unsourced/non-neutral version. I was going to clean it up to remove some of the non-neutrality and lack of sourcing, but I thought you might wish to intervene first. Your edits are here, and the restoration of the old content is here. —Zach425 /contribs 20:56, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
- I thought about rolling back, but I'm not sure it's that simple. The article has a real problem being single-sourced, however, I think this can be resolved by improvement rather than just cutting it back to a stub as I suspect reasonable mention in sources (esp. non-English) can be uncovered. I agree that the non-neutral text needs to be trimmed. Bit busy, so I'll probably not get around to looking further. Cheers --Fæ (talk) 06:52, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi Fæ, I'm still hoping to get your feedback on the Text Retrieval Conference (TREC) article -- see question in talk page. If you agree that the citations have been improved, we'd like to remove the notability flag that you attached. Perhaps of interest to you and other Wikipedians is the new session in TREC about algorithms for recommending edits to Misplaced Pages jrf (talk)