| Revision as of 17:40, 23 January 2012 view sourceSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,332 editsm Signing comment by 168.137.100.23 - ""← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:42, 23 January 2012 view source Fæ (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers83,148 edits ceNext edit → | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:14, 22 January 2012 (UTC) | It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:14, 22 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
| :What an unnecessary notice, the designer never thought of ]. It is rather annoying as in these cases I converted inter-wiki links to local links and did not actually add the link itself to the article. Guess I am forced to add the surplus code {{((}}bots|deny=DPL bot}} to my page header. --] (]) 12:06, 22 January 2012 (UTC) | :What an unnecessary notice, the designer never thought of ]. It is rather annoying as in these cases I converted inter-wiki links to local links and did not actually add the link itself to the article. Guess I am forced to add the surplus code {{((}}bots|deny=DPL bot}} to my page header. --] (]) 12:06, 22 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ==H&R Block== | |||
| Hi Fæ, I'm hoping to discuss the flag you attached about the changes to the H&R Block page. I made edits today to update a sorely outdated page. | Hi Fæ, I'm hoping to discuss the flag you attached about the changes to the H&R Block page. I made edits today to update a sorely outdated page. | ||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
| Can you provide any background on what you think still needs to be improved? Or if you agree the product section was the issue and now has been improved, we'd like to ask to remove the flag that you attached. Thanks <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 17:38, 23 January 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | Can you provide any background on what you think still needs to be improved? Or if you agree the product section was the issue and now has been improved, we'd like to ask to remove the flag that you attached. Thanks <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 17:38, 23 January 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
| *{{la|H&R Block}} | |||
Revision as of 17:42, 23 January 2012
| Click to start a new talk topic |
| Please do not remove trolling or vandalism from this page without emailing me for confirmation first.
If you wish to contact me about any Wikimedia UK chapter matters, please email me using this email form, rather than leaving a message on my user page or on a Misplaced Pages noticeboard. Any email indicated as confidential will be limited to discussion with board members and full time staff in line with Charity Commission requirements. |
 Archives |
|
2010 2011 2012 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
 | Disclaimer Any opinions expressed on Misplaced Pages, sister projects or in tweets and blog posts are mine and do not represent the opinion of Wikimedia UK or any other organization that I am affiliated with. – Fæ |
Text Retrieval Conference
Hi Fæ, I'm still hoping to get your feedback on the Text Retrieval Conference (TREC) article -- see question in talk page. If you agree that the citations have been improved, we'd like to remove the notability flag that you attached. Perhaps of interest to you and other Wikipedians is the new session in TREC about algorithms for recommending edits to Misplaced Pages jrf (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:08, 17 January 2012 (UTC).
- Sorry I was so late in returning to this. I have removed the tag based on your improvements. I remain a bit unconvinced about conferences but this is probably an issue for the lack of good guidelines in this area. The article is obviously created in good faith and I hope you continue to work on it to make long term impact on the historic record as obvious as possible. Cheers --Fæ (talk) 21:37, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
You've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
SarahStierch (talk) 21:28, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Behavior mutation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Replication and Locus
- Chen Wei (artist) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Chen
- William Drenttel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Metropolitan Transit Authority
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
- What an unnecessary notice, the designer never thought of DTTR. It is rather annoying as in these cases I converted inter-wiki links to local links and did not actually add the link itself to the article. Guess I am forced to add the surplus code {{bots|deny=DPL bot}} to my page header. --Fæ (talk) 12:06, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
H&R Block
Hi Fæ, I'm hoping to discuss the flag you attached about the changes to the H&R Block page. I made edits today to update a sorely outdated page.
I moved the 2 former business units, Financial Advisors and RSM McGladrey, from the Business section to the history section. That content doesn't appear to be promotional in nature.
Also the products section only listed one product, so I added from the current annual report the other products. When the flag was added, I deleted the descriptions in case they seemed promotional in nature.
Can you provide any background on what you think still needs to be improved? Or if you agree the product section was the issue and now has been improved, we'd like to ask to remove the flag that you attached. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.137.100.23 (talk) 17:38, 23 January 2012 (UTC)