| Revision as of 20:15, 21 January 2012 editSitush (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers260,192 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Kashmiri people. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:54, 24 January 2012 edit undoEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,204 edits →Slow edit-warring at Kalhana: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
| If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. You may still be blocked for ] even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 20:15, 21 January 2012 (UTC) | If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. You may still be blocked for ] even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 20:15, 21 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
| == Slow edit-warring at ] == | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''48 hours''' for ], as you did at ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. </p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> You persist in adding the unsourced claim that Kalhana was a ]. The latest addition is but you've been doing this for months. You never provide a source, and in your entire history on Misplaced Pages you have never left a talk comment. If you persist in making controversial changes with no evidence of consensus, you may be indefinitely blocked. ] (]) 15:54, 24 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:54, 24 January 2012
October 2011
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Kalhana, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Misplaced Pages:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 07:40, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Kashmiri Brahmin. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 18:28, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Kashmiri Brahmin. This contravenes Misplaced Pages's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Sitush (talk) 00:28, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive or inappropriate editing, as you did at Agrawal, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Misplaced Pages Manual of Style, edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. AnwarInsaan (talk) 13:42, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
November 2011
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Kashmiri Pandit, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Misplaced Pages:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 03:51, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
Edit warring at Kashmiri Pandit
Your recent editing history shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.
If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. EdJohnston (talk) 19:11, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
December 2011
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Muhammad Iqbal, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Misplaced Pages:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --lTopGunl (talk) 17:22, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Kalhana. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 17:59, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Yāska. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. DVdm (talk) 11:16, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kalhana. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sitush (talk) 11:16, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Kalhana, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages without further notice. As far as I am concerned, your continued adulteration of what the sources say for this article now constitutes vandalism, ie: a deliberate disruption of the Misplaced Pages project. Do this once more and I shall seek intervention from an administrator. Sitush (talk) 19:06, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
January 2012
Your recent editing history at Kashmiri people shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.
If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Sitush (talk) 20:15, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Slow edit-warring at Kalhana
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
You persist in adding the unsourced claim that Kalhana was a Kashmiri Pandit. The latest addition is here but you've been doing this for months. You never provide a source, and in your entire history on Misplaced Pages you have never left a talk comment. If you persist in making controversial changes with no evidence of consensus, you may be indefinitely blocked. EdJohnston (talk) 15:54, 24 January 2012 (UTC)