Misplaced Pages

Intellectual dishonesty: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:20, 21 December 2005 editJ M Rice (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,704 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 18:54, 7 April 2006 edit undo130.232.130.226 (talk) Removed another Epistemic virtue + typoNext edit →
Line 15: Line 15:
*] *]
*] *]
*] *]

*]


] ]

Revision as of 18:54, 7 April 2006

It has been suggested that this article be merged with Research. (Discuss)

Intellectual dishonesty is the creation of misleading impressions through the use of rhetoric, logical fallacy, fraud, or misrepresented evidence. It may stem from an ulterior motive, haste, sloppiness, or external pressure to reach a certain conclusion. The unwary reader may be deceived as a result.

Scientists and scholars generally consider plagiarism a serious form of intellectual dishonesty. Other examples include the incorrect attribution of a quotation or quotation out of context, use of obfuscated or irrelevant citations, deceptive omission of contextual text through ellipsis, and the unsupported amplification of a relationship.

See also

Stub icon

This philosophy-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: