Revision as of 18:47, 2 February 2012 editLittleolive oil (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers25,081 edits →Strong support for returning: cmt← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:16, 3 February 2012 edit undoPumpkinSky (talk | contribs)20,866 edits attempted blackmail by will bebackNext edit → | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
*I hope you decide to come back. When presented with a proper forum, the community has spoken in a positive and supportive way.(] (]) 18:47, 2 February 2012 (UTC)) | *I hope you decide to come back. When presented with a proper forum, the community has spoken in a positive and supportive way.(] (]) 18:47, 2 February 2012 (UTC)) | ||
==Attempted blackmail by Will Beback== | |||
Will Beback sent this to me and I refuse to condone blackmail. Note I have twice in this thread asked him to leave me alone and yet he persists. The full thread is presented below with personal email redacted. Since he refuses to wait for Arbcom to handle this, which is what I wanted, I feel I have no other recourse other than to post here since he's clearly stated he will make the alleged posts without waiting for arbcom. He also appears to be ignoring an AN thread about me being banned where not banning is the clear consensus. Does this mean Will alone decides who edits and doesn't edit wiki and under only his conditions? | |||
----------------------------- | |||
Thanks for admitting you were in shanigans behind my back! And AC was in on it! | |||
You are now blocked from my email account. So don't bother sending me things | |||
again. | |||
R | |||
---- Will Beback <will's email> wrote: | |||
> The ArbCom is already aware of these allegations, which we all agreed need | |||
> not be aired publicly so long as Rlevse did not return, and which | |||
> NewYorkBrad told me would be dealt with if Rlevse should return. | |||
> | |||
> There is no question that Rlevse has returned, although the current account | |||
> has been blocked. | |||
> | |||
> Despite my request, Rlevse has not committed to not returning again. | |||
> Therefore these issues should be dealt with publicly to prevent a repeat. | |||
> | |||
> -Will | |||
> | |||
>I readily admitted I am PSKY so what's the news? I am not BM as you and others | |||
>claim. | |||
> | |||
>You haven't violated anything? HA. Try blackmail of me. Hounding and stalking of | |||
>others, etc. | |||
>Now that your blackmail backfired, go for it. But be careful, it could and | |||
>should backfire on you. | |||
>AC--you have full notice of this. | |||
>Will--leave me alone, no, don't leave me alone, it'll be more proof of how you | |||
>hound and stalk other editors. | |||
>R | |||
---- Will Beback <will's email> wrote: | |||
> Ah, so it is you. | |||
> | |||
> I haven't engaged in any "shenanigans". I haven't violated any Misplaced Pages | |||
> policies, in letter or spirit. | |||
> | |||
> Since you do not seem to care about the issue, I will post a full account | |||
> of your work as a bureaucrat and the participation of JoJo. | |||
> | |||
> See also: | |||
> http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Bureaucrats'_noticeboard#Rename_un-vani | |||
shed_editor | |||
> | |||
> | |||
> | |||
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:42 PM, <r's email> wrote: | |||
> | |||
> > Will: | |||
> > | |||
> > Proof I called your bluf and sent this to arbcom and am not afraid of you. | |||
> > | |||
> > Now you leave me alone. | |||
> > | |||
> > R | |||
> > ---- r's email wrote: | |||
> > > Just so you guys know...do or not do what you want. All I ask for is a | |||
> > receipt that this was received and read. | |||
> > > | |||
> > > R | |||
> > > | |||
> > > > Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 18:35:10 -0500 | |||
> > > > From: <r's email> | |||
> > > > To: will's email | |||
> > > > Subject: Re: Misplaced Pages Rlevse | |||
> > > > | |||
> > > > And OBTW, I've sent this attempt at blackmail to arbcom. | |||
> > > > | |||
> > > > | |||
> > > > ---- r's email wrote: | |||
> > > > > You are so full of shit and the biggest hypocrit ever. Your threats | |||
> > don't scare me. The good thing this every day more and more people become | |||
> > aware of your shenanigans. You can kiss my ass. | |||
> > > > > | |||
> > > > > | |||
> > > > > ---- Will Beback <Will's email> wrote: | |||
> > > > > > After your original departure, I participated in the clean-up | |||
> > effort to address your many problem edits. As part of that effort I came | |||
> > across your history of closing AFDs as a bureaucrat, in particular those in | |||
> > which user:JoJo participated. I have not discussed this matter publicly, as | |||
> > I thought that there was no point in dragging your name through the mud if | |||
> > you'd left the project. But if you keep returning then the whole "RTV" | |||
> > thing was just a deception too and I will air it publicly. | |||
> > > > > > | |||
> > > > > > Since you've returned once, and possibly twice, without | |||
> > transparency I am now looking for an assurance from you that you will not | |||
> > do so again. Please reply at your earliest convenience. Otherwise I'll | |||
> > assume this is part of an ongoing pattern which is likely to be repeated, | |||
> > and act accordingly. | |||
> > > > > > | |||
> > > > > > -Will | |||
> > > > > > | |||
------------ | |||
:01:16, 3 February 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:16, 3 February 2012
- User:PumpkinSky/Articles
- User:PumpkinSky/Awards
- User:PumpkinSky/Sandbox
- User:PumpkinSky/Sandbox2
- User:PumpkinSky/Tools
- NRHP Query
- NRHP db
Archives |
Strong support for returning
There is strong support for you to return to editing. Please see the thread at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard#Propose community ban for User:Rlevse / User:Vanished 6551232. I don't know the ins and outs of how to do it, but if you would like to return to editing I suggest you say so, and things will be arranged by the grownups in charge, if any can be found. Regards, --Ninja Dianna (Talk) 18:04, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
- I hope you decide to come back. When presented with a proper forum, the community has spoken in a positive and supportive way.(olive (talk) 18:47, 2 February 2012 (UTC))
Attempted blackmail by Will Beback
Will Beback sent this to me and I refuse to condone blackmail. Note I have twice in this thread asked him to leave me alone and yet he persists. The full thread is presented below with personal email redacted. Since he refuses to wait for Arbcom to handle this, which is what I wanted, I feel I have no other recourse other than to post here since he's clearly stated he will make the alleged posts without waiting for arbcom. He also appears to be ignoring an AN thread about me being banned where not banning is the clear consensus. Does this mean Will alone decides who edits and doesn't edit wiki and under only his conditions?
Thanks for admitting you were in shanigans behind my back! And AC was in on it!
You are now blocked from my email account. So don't bother sending me things again.
R
Will Beback <will's email> wrote:
> The ArbCom is already aware of these allegations, which we all agreed need > not be aired publicly so long as Rlevse did not return, and which > NewYorkBrad told me would be dealt with if Rlevse should return. > > There is no question that Rlevse has returned, although the current account > has been blocked. > > Despite my request, Rlevse has not committed to not returning again. > Therefore these issues should be dealt with publicly to prevent a repeat. > > -Will > >I readily admitted I am PSKY so what's the news? I am not BM as you and others >claim. > >You haven't violated anything? HA. Try blackmail of me. Hounding and stalking of >others, etc. >Now that your blackmail backfired, go for it. But be careful, it could and >should backfire on you. >AC--you have full notice of this. >Will--leave me alone, no, don't leave me alone, it'll be more proof of how you >hound and stalk other editors. >R
Will Beback <will's email> wrote:
> Ah, so it is you. > > I haven't engaged in any "shenanigans". I haven't violated any Misplaced Pages > policies, in letter or spirit. > > Since you do not seem to care about the issue, I will post a full account > of your work as a bureaucrat and the participation of JoJo. > > See also: > http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Bureaucrats'_noticeboard#Rename_un-vani shed_editor > > > > On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:42 PM, <r's email> wrote: > > > Will: > > > > Proof I called your bluf and sent this to arbcom and am not afraid of you. > > > > Now you leave me alone. > > > > R > > ---- r's email wrote: > > > Just so you guys know...do or not do what you want. All I ask for is a > > receipt that this was received and read. > > > > > > R > > > > > > > Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 18:35:10 -0500 > > > > From: <r's email> > > > > To: will's email > > > > Subject: Re: Misplaced Pages Rlevse > > > > > > > > And OBTW, I've sent this attempt at blackmail to arbcom. > > > > > > > > > > > > ---- r's email wrote: > > > > > You are so full of shit and the biggest hypocrit ever. Your threats > > don't scare me. The good thing this every day more and more people become > > aware of your shenanigans. You can kiss my ass. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---- Will Beback <Will's email> wrote: > > > > > > After your original departure, I participated in the clean-up > > effort to address your many problem edits. As part of that effort I came > > across your history of closing AFDs as a bureaucrat, in particular those in > > which user:JoJo participated. I have not discussed this matter publicly, as > > I thought that there was no point in dragging your name through the mud if > > you'd left the project. But if you keep returning then the whole "RTV" > > thing was just a deception too and I will air it publicly. > > > > > > > > > > > > Since you've returned once, and possibly twice, without > > transparency I am now looking for an assurance from you that you will not > > do so again. Please reply at your earliest convenience. Otherwise I'll > > assume this is part of an ongoing pattern which is likely to be repeated, > > and act accordingly. > > > > > > > > > > > > -Will > > > > > >
- 01:16, 3 February 2012 (UTC)