| Revision as of 21:11, 11 February 2012 editMontanabw (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers105,438 edits →GA Review: Please review the un-trashed version← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:43, 11 February 2012 edit undoJustlettersandnumbers (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators120,828 edits →GA ReviewNext edit → | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| *An interesting article on a subject I have never thought about! | *An interesting article on a subject I have never thought about! | ||
| ] (]) 20:42, 11 February 2012 (UTC) | ] (]) 20:42, 11 February 2012 (UTC) | ||
| :Hi, Mathew! Dana will probably be able to answer many of your questions better than I. Briefly, in order, the little I can offer: I wasn't able to find '''any''' reliable reference to the Large Black from before 1899, but maybe Dana has and will add it in place of the cn tag; map? - pass; apparently the LB is a foraging breed that does well in extensive systems, while others do better indoors; supposedly the large ears make it docile, and easy to contain (single-strand fencing); I think the section on the history in the US needs expanding, and that on the history in Australia still needs to be written; extensive farming, see above!; yes, you have to laugh at a sun-resistant pig in England, but maybe this was a useful characteristic in South Africa, Jamaica, Australia?; the meat/bacon thing needs fixing, pigs are for pork or for bacon, both are meat; the only other Large Black pig reported to the FAO is in the Russian Federation. How much, if any, of that should be answered in the article? Obviously, despite the rubbish below, my intention is neither to confuse you nor disrupt any process. Thank you for your comments. ] (]) 21:43, 11 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Important comment''' I have reverted the article to the who nominated this article. Please review that version, I am filing an ANI on Justlettersandnumbers as this is the FOURTH time he has attempted to derail one of Dana's GA or FA articles and his harassment must stop now. ]<sup>]</sup> 21:11, 11 February 2012 (UTC) | *'''Important comment''' I have reverted the article to the who nominated this article. Please review that version, I am filing an ANI on Justlettersandnumbers as this is the FOURTH time he has attempted to derail one of Dana's GA or FA articles and his harassment must stop now. ]<sup>]</sup> 21:11, 11 February 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:43, 11 February 2012
GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 17:16, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Will start review soon. Looks interesting! MathewTownsend (talk) 17:16, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- comments
- there is a {{cn}} tag. - I'm not sure a citation is needed there.
- it would be helpful to have a map for all these places in England.
- why is the Large Black not suitable for "intensive farming"?
- why are such large ears favored? - (just curious)
- "The first American imports were in the 1920s, but the population dwindled to the point where imports were again necessary in 1985." - was the Large Black thriving in America? Wouldn't the breed change in America so that importing them from American would change the breed in Britain?
- "The Large Black is a long, deep-bodied pig, well known for its hardiness and suitability for extensive farming" - why?
- "It is the only pig breed in Britain to be all black, and this trait helps protect the pig from sunburn in sunny climates." - does Britain have enough sunny climates that this would be an issue? I thought not but I could be wrong.
- "the Large Black was used mainly for meat production, especially bacon. The meat from the Large Black is known for its quality and flavour, but for pork production it was often crossed with the Yorkshire and Middle White pigs" - my ignorance - isn't bacon pork? And I don't understand what this bit is trying to say.
- With so many breeds of black pigs in the world, is the title for this article right? No (British pig) or whatever?
- An interesting article on a subject I have never thought about!
MathewTownsend (talk) 20:42, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, Mathew! Dana will probably be able to answer many of your questions better than I. Briefly, in order, the little I can offer: I wasn't able to find any reliable reference to the Large Black from before 1899, but maybe Dana has and will add it in place of the cn tag; map? - pass; apparently the LB is a foraging breed that does well in extensive systems, while others do better indoors; supposedly the large ears make it docile, and easy to contain (single-strand fencing); I think the section on the history in the US needs expanding, and that on the history in Australia still needs to be written; extensive farming, see above!; yes, you have to laugh at a sun-resistant pig in England, but maybe this was a useful characteristic in South Africa, Jamaica, Australia?; the meat/bacon thing needs fixing, pigs are for pork or for bacon, both are meat; the only other Large Black pig reported to the FAO is in the Russian Federation. How much, if any, of that should be answered in the article? Obviously, despite the rubbish below, my intention is neither to confuse you nor disrupt any process. Thank you for your comments. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:43, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- Important comment I have reverted the article to the last stable version by Dana boomer who nominated this article. Please review that version, I am filing an ANI on Justlettersandnumbers as this is the FOURTH time he has attempted to derail one of Dana's GA or FA articles and his harassment must stop now. Montanabw 21:11, 11 February 2012 (UTC)